Help me decide final ascension perk.

[Lucius Confucius]

It stands between Archao-Engineers, Technological Ascendancy, Voidborne, and Detox.

I have 6 planets in my x5 habitable worlds game that I can detox, but it might be better to just spam good habitats. However, I foresee a mineral shortage in my late-late game (have already built a matter decompressor). Will there be more planets to detox in the galaxy?

Archao-Engineers seems fun, I do utilize some of their weapons on my ships, but not that much.

Choices, choices. What would you pick?

[gn_fighter]

i think techno ascendancy as the final pick is to weak, voidborne with x5 habitable is questionable as well if you ask me.

So i would either look for detox or archaeo-engineer. I personally would probably pick archo since i really like the archeo-refinery and some ship-modules for my big ships but i guess what depends on your situation since i don't know if how your special-rescource-production ( mote's, crystals, gas ) looks compared to your need for minerals ( you can still have tier 2 habitats without the perk i think ).

[Lucius Confucius]

Thanks, that narrows it down. So if I pick archao-engineers my ancient refineries will work better? Did not know that, interesting.

[gn_fighter]

Originally posted by Lucius Confucius:

Thanks, that narrows it down. So if I pick archao-engineers my ancient refineries will work better? Did not know that, interesting.

Dunno the the tech/building should tell you that tbh. Honestly.. i thought that's a tech you can only get with archo-engineering due to it only showing up for me after i took the perk.

The Wiki says no though so i guess it depends how many archo-modules you intend to use for your ships.

right now its probably not that good due to the AI's bias against shields.

[Kinetika]

i'm no expert but i believe Tech Ascendancy at that point is too late to properly benefit from it