Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Other way of thinking is that tall means most sprawl is because of planet development while wide means sprawl by expanding number of systems.
From my understanding:
Wide vs tall isnt how many planets it is what kind of planets.
Tall players pick good planets and focus of making them as good as possible.
Wide player take whatever they can get there greedy little hands on and put only enough effort into it to make sure it isnt going to revolt.
Basicly a tall player will look at a ice planet and say: Not worth it.
A wide player would say: Stop whining and get me more minirals.
Wide players focus on quantity over quality where tall players focus on quality over quantity.
Wide players tent to be agressive because you have planets and they want them.
Tall players tent to be more federation/vassal focused as they dont want your crap underdevoled planet.
Tall is instead of getting many pops, it focus on making the few pops you have more efficient. (more buildings and tech to make jobs better)
Wide is playing over administrative capacity. Think of it as taking as much territory as possible, IE wide.
Currently in 2.2 I would venture to say the consensus is wide game play is going over the administration cap and tall is staying under it.
granted my home system has 7 colonized worlds.
WHAT WAS, WILL BE; WHAT WILL BE, WAS
wide is conquer other lands ^_^
Tall = focused on planet development, not so much space grabbing.
But I wouldn't call one strategy necessarily superior over the other, since it also comes down to what government you play. A Pacifist couldn't play really wide imho, except you're pretty quick
with grabbing space.
in other words
Wide focuses on developing its fleets and conquering other empires early, while Tall focuses on early economy development focusing on research output in order to get an advantage on mid-late game.
Wide is considered sacrificing development for rapid expansion and tall is sacrificing rapid expansion for development. You can balance this, but it's usually better to start out Wide and end in tall.