Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
On the other hand, since making that reply, I've seen an AI fleet do their 'every ship has disengaged I'm'a emer-jump' well before the timer has elapsed
Whenever opposing fleet strengths are roughly equivalent, I tend to see much more balanced results and a far smaller percentage of enemy ships seem to flag out.
Of course, I have been unable to reproduce this from the other side of the equation. Any time one of my fleets would get an engagement bonus due to fleet strength disparity, it is almost always a total fleet wipe situation.
If I had to guess, I would say the AI probably does prioritize tech, policies, and perhaps even traditions that buff disengagement chance. In general, the AI is perfectly willing to sacrifice its planets in order to protect its fleet, so these kind of tactics make a weird kind of sense.
You only get the war doctrines option if you fill out the supremacy ambition. If it's not finished you don't get a bonus.
My fleet had a green -100% emergency ftl jump charge time buff while theirs had a red +200% time debuff and mine couldn't e-jump yet
correction: The one right below the policy which determines whether you can fight wars of aggression, as I don't have the game open to look atm
Yes it's below the war philosophy.