Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There is no way to denounce the other side. It really ruins the game.
Look up the reverse decision for that policy and propose it using influence. Sadly such silly votes do happen and you probably have to wait a while before you can make the counter proposal, which (even when 90% would strongly benefit) might even have 'weak support' at first.
So I generally go for council member or custodian and regularly check what empires are proposing and down-vote or veto anything that I deem problematic (which is a lot).
Oh. And I can't even get the damned breach to go away.
It's called "crisis" for a reason.
You not having prepared appropriately for the Crisis is more of a you problem, than a game problem. If you can't reign in your economy before... 2350 I believe is the first possible year of end-game crisis (if you're playing standard) and pump out fleets like the universe depends on it (well your galaxy) then you have a lot left to learn.
There's a reason why there's a slider for the Crisis strength.