Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you checked this link, you will notice that Hegomony needs for severel laws a much smaller centralisation then other feds. So you will get this laws much easier and earlier.
yes, the other member gain better ressource boni, but they can't leave the fed, and you control the fed!
Hmm? I was under the impression that the leader gets all the bonuses. Since there are two type of bonuses, member bonuses and leader bonuses, the leader being both a leader and member of the federation.
From what I can tell, Hegemony is the only federation in which some bonuses--the really good ones that increase job production--apply ONLY to the non-president members; hence "Other Member Bonuses."
Right... but I think part of my point is that you can eventually control any type of fed (once you grow your strength by midgame, reach level 3 in the fed, and change vote weight to diplomatic weight), and then you reap more sweet bonuses. The principal advantage of a hegemony, it seems, is instant gratification. And even then, if you, say, start the hegemony with the origin, then the other members can pass you up and become the new hegemony president, right? So it does still seem like the hegemony has the potential for great short term gratification but loses in the long term?
And if you lost control of Hegomony, then you are just not worthy to lead it. Ask the Klingons for help then.
Tbh the main long term benefit of the hedgemony federation is that you can force others into the federation with its cassus belli and thus gain a much larger federation, that you are in total control of, then would otherwise be possible.
Other federations has a hard time getting that many members since both the people you are asking to join and the current members will refuse to form/join a federation with empires they don't like. Even if you somehow manage to circumvent that issue the other members could potentially outvote you on stuff if they combine their diplomatic weight.
Also this federation type has way more bonuses to its president then the other federation types (even if it can be argued that the member bonuses are stronger then the president bonuses, note that "members get stronger bonuses" can be argued for most federation types).
Most of what you're saying, I can agree with, but this part here, not so much. I believe the hegemony is the only federation that confers specific bonuses to only non-president members. From what I can tell, in every other federation type, the president also receives the bonuses applicable to its members. In the hegemony, the president misses out on that sweet 5% job production bonus, for examkle!
In a Hegemony, most presidents worth their salt have those members roped in by that point so that their primarily using that bonus to fuel the federation war machine.
All it really works out to be is a kind of delegation of labor. Sure you miss out on those bonuses, but they're doing the work and handing it to you.