Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
you can't move planets from one sector to another any more.
As azunai said, sector is 4 jumps range from the planet where you created the sector. So all other planets in range are automatically belonging to the new sector. All sectors, except core, can be deleted in the same place where you create them. You can only delete from the planet where you created it, not other planets in the same sector.
You can not directly move planets in other sectors, but you can distribute sectors differently, which might cause a planet to be in a different sector, by remove a sector and create it on a different planet.
That is a great description of my position!
It depends on how long someone intends to play the game. It'll take a few years for buying the already existing individual DLCs to be cheaper than the subscription, unless I'm missing something :) ?
I'm not complaining though. Coming back to the game again I was relieved each sector having its own resource pool is gone.
I was about to say it's not true you can't move planets between sectors, but that was an old comment.
I guess it depends on how you interpret buying "the base game." I bought in with the bundle that included most of the DLCs. Yes, it's true that the larger your backlog of unpurchased DLCs, the more economical it is to use the subscription to access the content you haven't purchased. I was assuming that he'd bought the previously released content. The game's full price is substantial, but not too great a burden for "eldery, cash-only types," which I'd probably count as. My point was that the value of the "subscription" doesn't lie in the products that are coming, but really in the back-catalog that's already been released. If you just need to keep up with the release schedule of the DLCs, the subscription is not a good deal.