Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It would make much more sense to make the "stop population growth" decision easier (in the sense that the Egalitarian faction is OK with it) if a planet has any of the following:
-Zero or Negative Amenities
-Zero or Negative Housing
-More Pops than Jobs
That way, instead of putting more pops on an already-overpopulated planet, the pops would automatically emigrate to another planet (if available), instead of the current system where growth doesn't really stop until you've got three-four pops that are unhoused.
Pops will no longer grow on that planet and will only cause pops on other planets to grow faster through emigration.
Do note how ever, they will take 25% more consumer goods
no free housing, then no grow of pop..
Yes!! when planet is at cap.. everyone gets neutered...
That's why it's called growth rate, they have more pops born rather than death.
It's also why authoritarian factions have some advantage over egalitarians in the longrun with regards to population control. Even if not as much economic advantage (which is a bit of a toss up).
If you really are concerned about it, and no longer finding spots to put them.. then you should be playing authoritarian or non-egalitarian.