Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Terraforming is cheaper within the same category of world ("Wet" for example is Ocean, Jungle, Terran Worlds), if you want to change the world into another category (say Ocean to Desert) it costs more. Gaia-transformation also costs more and terraforming a tomb-world into anything costs more.
2) There are three groupings of planet types:
Dry: Savannah, Arid, Desert
Wet: Jungle, Continental, Ocean
Cold: Tundra, Alpine, Arctic
Terraforming a planet from one type to another type in the same group (ie Jungle -> Ocean) is less expensive and faster than terraforming a planet to a type in a different group (ie Desert -> Ocean).
Edit: What he said.
And the terraforming costs make sense, now, as well so thanks.