Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Think of it like this: if you're doing the job right, you ARE the end game crisis.
Unfortunately implementing something like your suggestion is going to be pretty hard, especially in multiplayer where you aren't bound by the mechanical rules of no alliances that would hold you back in singleplayer. Part of multiplayer is to make alliances and find someone to help you fight - even if just temporarily.
If an enemy player managed to band together with others in order to take you out, that's sad but also sadly part of how the game works.
No federation can have more than 1 AI member for every human. Or no AI members, human allies only.
Or band together to take him out first with an informal alliance (i. e. no ingame pact, just all declare war on him and take him out) and then tell him that you'll keep doing that as long as he keeps pwning you with AI minions.
Or do the same - get into federations with AIs so when he does declare war you'll have AI on your side, too.
The problem is that all he's doing is using a tool available in the game (federations and diplomacy) for exactly the reason it is in the game - to allow him to gain strength in numbers and overwhelm individual empires by ganging up on them.
That's working as intended - either stop him before he can do it, do as he does or live with the consequences of not stopping him.
Bersides, your solution would only result in people declaring wars on each other before ganging up on their enemy. Or declaring war on empires on the other side of the map - that would allow people to easily devour neighbours (leaving neigbours 'alive' at some 80% warscore for the bonus and then annexing half the galazy in one go).
IF swarms would get a buff, thats all people would use in MP.
You misunderstand. Houserules are for cases like yours, where you play a race that is explicitly designed to either snowball or die to federations, but find it unfair if someone elses uses the exact tool provided for this situation against you.
An example for this would be werewolves complaining that the enemy keeps using silver on them or vampires being salty about getting turned into crispy critters by prats as they sleep.
In short: house rules are for when you can't stand someone using something completely valid in the game to ruin your roleplaying fun. :P
give genocidal empires ecconomic benefits as well as military ones, something like access to a unique edict that gives a small bonus to resource output per enemy you're at war with that stacks with production targets and capacity overload.