Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm not sure what mess you're talking about but I have not seen anything in your post that would help balance and "common sense" is a nonsense term used to mean "I feel that something is someway therefore it must be" it has no place in rational discussion.
messing with genes not and that's as ancient like 5000 years ago. a Type II civilization engeneering can like we doing with GMOs.
you can build a Dyson sphere (or swarm) in stellaris that means you are type II civilization no debate nessassary.
Talk about surpopulation and everything which comes with it...
And i doubt many people would like the guys in power immortal either.
It is a human dream...provided you are the one immortal, or just a select few, otherwise it would turn into hell quite fast.
110 billions humans have lived upto now, happily they are dead, otherwise we would be quite cramped...
In real life.
if people would become immortal (which you would not be with 100% cell generation) keep that in mind. those people gonna live a total other kind of live they likely would take a child at the age of 5000 years or so. it will balance it self out.
In stellaris.
overpopulation really?? so many planets
You could make leaders immortal instead of living 150+ years, wouldnt change anything really.
If we were lving 5000 years, sure, life would be very different.
Too bad, the society would stay stagnant as the guys in place in all domains would stay there for a very very very long time with no reason to leave the place at all.
New ideas would come at a very slow pace.
At least, death makes place for new guys allowing a constant and fresh new take on things.
Note that i would have no problem to be immortal (provided i can end it if i want), but me and perhaps some selected by me people, noone else.
One help you to habit more planets and give additionnal years to your guys,
another boost your sciences in every way,
another allow to grow your pop faster than any other faction, populating the galaxie with your specie,
another give you living robots
and other thing.
What I agree, is that you can't "uppgrade" your gene, that is a joke, why can't we can't go from stong to super strong or from intelligent to erudite ?
---------
If you only care about immortality then go for the synth, at the pisonic guy, only the chosen one are immortal
Exactly those propaganda tech nerds try to push on people, like you need "robotic crap to live forever it's total ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. So why can't stellaris dev's not add 500+ or 1000+ years to Engineered Evolution? It's like being master with CRISPR but can't do crap.