Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Own 40% of the planets (expansion but also military because you need to kill people before inhabiting their planets).
Have your federation own 60% of the planets (diplomacy).
Kill or enslave all other races.
But it also means that if you join with enough other races, you can win strictly through diplomacy and colonization, or at the very least would have to fight very few other races.
This sounds neat. I wanted to make sure there's alternate ways to win.
On the flip side, even if your federation doesn't quite cover 60% of the galaxy, you'll still have a pretty good sense of when you win, and even if you don't like any of the win conditions... Well, you can win when you feel you achive what you wanted to for your race. A lot of people like a role playing angle, where your end goal isn't one of the 3, but instead to just achive what you think your empire/species wants to achieve.
Or you could just eat everybody. You know, whatever you like.
With that said though, victory conditions are about the least important thing about this game, especially if you don't want to play combat-heavy all the time. In a way that's both, one of the biggest strengths and one of the biggest weaknesses of the game, it allows you to do whatever you want, but in the end it doesn't really lead anywhere.