Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That being said, I can see you have a monitor refresh rate 120hz (or at least I assume the number I looked at is the monitor refresh rate), but mine is even higher, 165hz, and the game runs pretty well, it's not optimal, yeah, but it's not a complete disaster. I did the exact same thing - tried locking it at 60 FPS - and I'm okay with the game. Never understood why is playing at 120 FPS so neccessary to this many people.
That does not mean it shouldn't get improved though. But I doubt it will
My monitor is actually 240 Hz, I was just testing if using RTSS frame limiter will smooth frametime. And the reason why people like me play at high FPS is because of motion clarity. Going down from 120 to 60 is like enabling persistent motion blur. It's an inherent flaw of all LCDs. This is why technologies like nVidia ULBM or BFI exists. It also lowers input lag. And let me tell you: as someone who was playing at 60 FPS since early 2000s, going back to it causes me eye sore.
Enjoy the game :)
Now that said, Epic has been making significant improvements over time and one relatively easy (I don't actually know how much work this would be) thing for Croteam to do would be to update to the latest version of the engine. Talos 2 is on UE 5.2 and 5.5 may run significantly smoother. I'm curious to see what version this remaster ends up being and how it runs compared to Talos 2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HWzJMFeQv8
After Tomb Raider came out in 1996 and I got to experience it with a 3dfx Voodoo2 card two years later I thought I was in gaming heaven. The frame rate was capped at 30 and it seemed like magic. Perfectly playable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFyGSxs31Zo
I support people asking for whatever features and improvements they want in games, but these threads always make me chuckle. You can be much happier about your life circumstances if you just switch off the frame rate counters and real-time graphs / charts. Advice from an old fart.
I know what frame-time is
There's no need to bite.
This is gaslighting and I won't tolerate it. The problem isn't framerate and it never was, so you're either clueless or trolling me.
Gaslighting? All I'm saying is that my enjoyment of Talos and other games is not tied to them having a perfect, never stuttering appearance. I know what actual bad frame-rates and frame-times are from experience. They make a game unplayable.
You said that the game (Talos 2) runs smoothly at 60 FPS? Yet, you're not happy with that? You're not happy with a smoothly running game. You're lamenting the fact that you can't increase the frames to align with your monitor's 120Hz refresh-rate? What is that going to gain you, when you could already play the game?
No, I don't understand the obsession with these numbers. Aren't you happy to be able to play a game? Some people can't even afford to feed their kids..
It wasn't an argument. Merely an observation.
You sound like such unhappy people. :( So quick to anger... It doesn't hurt to put things into perspective and feel a little gratitude sometimes (see the glass half full instead of empty), but of course this can't be forced.
Peace to you both.
Signing Sodding off,
If it's the stuttering mess you claim, then perhaps you need better hardware.