Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'd love to have a road map, but I don't think they're too bothered atm, lol. Maybe they're avoiding a road map to mitigate expectations and timelines. They're working on the game, and it'll get done when it's done. They appreciate our feedback, obviously, but they said they'd continue working on it even if there was only one person playing. So, while declining numbers isn't exactly a morale boost for them, it also isn't a death knell.
Honestly I don't get people's problem with combat. Yeah it's basic and too RNG-heavy, but even before the proposed rework there was clearly an intention to add special attacks to it (and probably more) so we were never working with a fully-realized mechanic to begin with. Additionally, I never played RS but I recently started watching Settled and omg... OSRS combat is so much worse than BS combat, lol. The boss encounters and minigames look interesting, but the level grind? Literally braindead mechanics. For magic and ranged you just find a spot where you can trap an npc that can't ranged attack and just attack them without any danger of getting hit, because the AI pathfinding is just that bad. For melee, prayer overhead and semi-afk at crabs for 30 hours. So yeah, I wouldn't have compared the two games anyway, but now that I know more I really don't understand the comparison...
Its so funny to me that you do not understand that OSRS has a lot of players. Its not that its a bad game, Its you that don't understand.
This game is NOT anything but itself, its designed with mechanics that's new to me. Is it an attempt for immersive cross-play? The engine is top notch, the game looks and feels quite good, But some of the practical game mechanics is so counter intuitive, like complicated for no reason. This is a known issue with these devs they love to mess around with that, and us gamers
OSRS - and even RS3, if it wasn’t for all the MTX - seem like great games!
I never skilled combat in RS, I skilled Slayer. To me the game was almost perfect (for its type and how I played it, DIY ie do it yourself) at the last few months before the combat updates
From skilling slayer i maxed 5 skills. This game lack most things for a DIY player as of now.
AS this is early access I put myself as if I am in their content team trying to convey my sense of the game, and what seems less exiting.
Edit: After I quit RS I started to game at Steam, and have almost only played early access games. thats 8 years rougly. That's almost 18 years total, you have your rights to have opinions, so do I. Keep give constructive feedback to the dev team, stop bitnegativityching and whine, its an early access and its only a few weeks old. This go to all of you monkfish complaining
Edit: These ppl are coders, its easy to copy text automatically from any account anywhere, x included (web scrapers). to anywhere they need to update their players
I guess i will get silenced but I pray as many devs see this as possible. Regular players at regular games, no problem, but early access is here at Steam