Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I mean technically you can just look at your wins and your loss points. You always gain more from winning than losing so it automatically propels you higher.
If you're on a losing streak that bad you should just stop playing for a while and look at your replays. For minimum of 2+ hours anytime you enter a losing streak.
Unprivatize your account and let us look at it.
You do realize that I am making fun of EOMM lunatics right? I don't believe in it but ironically this post again proves them wrong in a way that, he cannot have so many losses since it's forced 50%.
I think the lack of math skills in the general population doesn't allow people to grasp the concept but it's HIGHLY likely it does since almost EVERY single ranked game that I know of has some form of it and Netease has a patent for it.
Might as well. Have fun analyzing my 40% one trick. No point in hiding it if I won't be playing anymore.
Well if you want some feedback I'll give it to ya. I have 1 GM, 1 Diamond 1 and a Plat 1 account one for each role and my best role is Strat.
I'm not sure what you trying to make out of this but EOMM is a myth. At least in a sense that there is no such system that force you to lose matches, and there is no such system that forces you to have bad teammates.
There is a developer confirmed it for one of their games so it's used and the most common way is to balance skill level on teams. So if you got a GM one team and a Plat on another you would have high Diamond and GM would have maybe high gold or something. That's the most common method used that I know of.
This ones a bit more complex though they balance off of hardware (framerates), ping, and who knows what else as measures of "fairness".
This is not happening in ranked at all. There can be 3 rank difference between ranks. That being said you cannot have matches that 2 division apart (6 ranks)
The system is much more nuanced than this.
You have an SR rating and the matchmaking trying to find you a team based on your SR rating. After your team has been assembled, it calculates your team's combined SR rating and tries to find you a match where the enemy team's combined SR rating is similar to yours. However the individual SR distribution can be different.
In short, you can have some lower tier players in your match, but not as extreme as you said. Also, if there is a lower tier player in your match that means the game will be balanced out that you also have a higher tier player in your match. Maybe you gonna get same tier players etc...
I can handle losing games. What I can't handle is the throwing, childish finger pointing, and lack of game knowledge from random teammates