Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The issue isn't 3 Healers, it's Luna, Cloak, and Mantis being required 2-ofs.
As the data very clearly demonstrates, 3H is inferior to 3D and 2/2/2.
It's fun as long as it doesn't include two of the following: Luna, Cloak, and Mantis.
The real issue is that support ults are just over tuned / braindead easy. Luna really needs to be looked at, C&d didn't need the 4th ult charge. Mantis is fine due to her normal healing being lackluster.
I've seen so many attempts at 3 healers fail that it's laughable. A backline DPS combined with 2 dive DPS will pretty consistently beat 3 healers
But most dont know that. they just go 2 2 2 like ow2
I didn't say it was unbeatable, i said it was better than 2 2 2. And your argument prove me right because luna,cloak and mantis are 3 healers.
Assuming your dps are good. With 3 healers even a trash team make into plat easy in rank. While with 2 2 2 your team has be actually good. One mistake and your team is cooked.
This stats are not trustworthy because based on popularity. if 2 2 2 is most popular it will have the highest stats based on the info you showed.
so git gud
Yeah Maybe , depends on the player.