Marvel Rivals shouldn't be free! If the developers charged people to purchase Marvel Rivals then the company would make more money, game development would speed up & more & better content would be added! Marvel Rivals should cost at least $49.99!

[Reverse-Xautos]

Marvel Rivals should not be free! If the developers charged people to purchase Marvel Rivals then the company would make more money, game development would speed up and more and better content would be added to Marvel Rivals! Marvel Rivals should cost at least $49.99!

[LegPuller]

Originally posted by Angelina:

Originally posted by Arc:

If it cost that much it'd be dead already.
Barely any maps and it constantly puts you in the same 2 spider maps over and over again ignoring the rest.
Massive balance issues with overtuned healing, healers who kill within 1 second with stuns, aoe instakill ults, etc.
Forced bot matches.
Ladder reset making smurfing non-optional lmao.
Etc etc
It gets away with a lot of objectively bad choices because its free and people don't have standards for free games.

Originally posted by Reverse-Xautos:

Marvel Rivals should not be free! If the developers charged people to purchase Marvel Rivals then the company would make more money, game development would speed up and more and better content would be added to Marvel Rivals! Marvel Rivals should cost at least $49.99!

If it cost that much then the game would be even better and it would sell even better!

Originally posted by Angelina:

Originally posted by Reverse-Xautos:

Marvel Rivals should not be free! If the developers charged people to purchase Marvel Rivals then the company would make more money, game development would speed up and more and better content would be added to Marvel Rivals! Marvel Rivals should cost at least $49.99!

I 100% agree!

Checking your post makes it obvious you're talking to yourself on alts. Actually so sad you need to go on alts so someone agrees with you

[Reverse-Xautos]

Originally posted by LegPuller:

Originally posted by Angelina:

If it cost that much then the game would be even better and it would sell even better!

Originally posted by Angelina:

I 100% agree!

Checking your post makes it obvious you're talking to yourself on alts. Actually so sad you need to go on alts so someone agrees with you

That is ridiculous! Obviously tons of people agree that free games should not be free!

[LegPuller]

Originally posted by Reverse-Xautos:

Originally posted by LegPuller:

Checking your post makes it obvious you're talking to yourself on alts. Actually so sad you need to go on alts so someone agrees with you

That is ridiculous! Obviously tons of people agree that free games should not be free!

From another bait attempt in a different forum with your accounts:

Originally posted by FurryQueenYT:

Originally posted by Angelina:

This is obviously a serious discussion. Leave people alone and let them discuss what they and let them make whatever comments that they want to.

Also, I appreciate that you are commenting and keeping this discussion visible!

You can't even hide that you're using alts hah! Same broken record over and over and over again, don't you have some furry smut to watch yet?

[Steve]

Originally posted by zachfulger:

Is this one of those posts that farms the clown award or something? Or is it an engagement farm?

This is actually old-school trolling. Back in the day, we used to make statements like this with the intent of baiting out a conversation on the matter. Seems to have worked.

Market won't bear the cost of a paid-for shooter, though, and there's no actual evidence that a purchase price or even a subscription would provide more money than the current business model does. There's every bit of evidence, however, that it won't.

The top seven FPS games on Steam are all free-to-play. The first paid title in this genre that I come across is Rainbow Six: Siege -- a 2015 title that has about 60,000 players at present. It's also got a VERY low price point (normally $20, on sale right now for $8).

The first full-priced title I come across is CoD 6, at the AAAA price of $70. It's got a tenth of the players that Marvel Rivals has, which is kind of a kick in the stones for a long-established title like CoD.

[Blix]

Hey y'all. Just sliding in to say to ignore the OP and any of the "supporters". They've been doing this across multiple games and odds are (and very likely those odds are btw) that they are someone sockpuppeting a buncha alts with the intent to annoy folks.

Also PS: Kinda wish I could run this, but my specs are a lil' outdated. Game looks mighty fun.

[Angelina]

Originally posted by Blix:

Hey y'all. Just sliding in to say to ignore the OP and any of the "supporters". They've been doing this across multiple games and odds are (and very likely those odds are btw) that they are someone sockpuppeting a buncha alts with the intent to annoy folks.

Also PS: Kinda wish I could run this, but my specs are a lil' outdated. Game looks mighty fun.

Hey y’all. Just letting you know that this person has been players post history who agree with me and using his multiple alt accounts to harass me and others and make up lies about me and others.

Just report this person and move on.

[Sonrangeri]

Usually buy-to-play games have less cheaters overall. When they get banned, they usually don't come back.

[Trax]

no no I think it should cost at minimum 129$.

[XanapyXP]

im so glad people like you don't run gaming companies, we'd have another concord in our hands

[Angelina]

Originally posted by XanapyXP:

im so glad people like you don't run gaming companies, we'd have another concord in our hands

You would definitely be happier if this game was not free to play!

[DaylightDemon]

Originally posted by Reverse-Xautos:

Marvel Rivals should not be free! If the developers charged people to purchase Marvel Rivals then the company would make more money, game development would speed up and more and better content would be added to Marvel Rivals! Marvel Rivals should cost at least $49.99!

the whole reasons why service games exist is that they make more money for games that need continous support and updates. on average, they get a lot more money from players than 50$ per person. i even bet they already got more money per person that downloaded the game than 50$

[Angelina]

Originally posted by Reverse-Xautos:

Marvel Rivals should not be free! If the developers charged people to purchase Marvel Rivals then the company would make more money, game development would speed up and more and better content would be added to Marvel Rivals! Marvel Rivals should cost at least $49.99!

It is a simple fact that this is what is best for this game.

[Krazy Wallet]

As someone that has no interest in cosmetics but a great interest in gameplay, I love the fact that it is free. I've played more hours of this than some of the games I actually purchased. Bring on the free!

[Volqor]

Free means that more people will try and more potential sales. If you had to buy the game then Less people would play and then that would be less people buying skins. People are willing to spend more money if they dont have to pay up front.

[Angelina]

Originally posted by Volqor:

Free means that more people will try and more potential sales. If you had to buy the game then Less people would play and then that would be less people buying skins. People are willing to spend more money if they dont have to pay up front.

Fee means no profit which means less updates and less content.