Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That would have to be a vote, which means it would still fail if 3 or less people agree'd to it. You generally would need majority for it to pass, which in this case be 4 of the 6 players on that team.
Eh, I feel that majority should be all that is needed for something to pass. Different people have different mind sets, preferences and beliefs. In ranked, exp if solo queuing, surrender would probably never pass if it required everyone to vote yes unless the game was really really really bad.
and even then, there's nothing stopping someone from purposely hitting no just because they want to troll and make everyone else suffer.
You'd also probably see less people quitting out of matches if it sticks to being majority vote and not everyone has to vote yes as well.
A lot of people just don't care what others think and will leave regardless to the situation they may be in. They'll gladly ditch if they don't get their way, even though it might :jarate: them off if they get the temp leaver ban from it. It means they're willing to drop even with the ban might hit them even if they hate it, they view it as the lesser punishment.