AIM Assist controller

[jmp]

why aim assist dosent work on controlller PC ? Settings is 100 %

[iNsAnEdRaGoN]

Cuz PC it doesn't exist

[Chaos Guard]

dont work

[Athena]

Get good instead. Stop relying on handicaps.

[SiNiSTAR]

If you need aim assist youre just bad and shouldnt even play the game, get good and play MK

[RB6]

I have written a comprehensive comment about the importance of adding effective support for Aim Assist for players using controllers in competitive games. The comment focuses on the necessity of balancing controller players with mouse and keyboard users while addressing common misconceptions. Here are the main points:

Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard:

The mouse offers unmatched precision and responsiveness, with the ability to easily adjust DPI and settings.
On the other hand, controllers rely on analog sticks, making aiming more challenging and less accurate.
Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism:

Aim Assist is not an unfair advantage; it is a tool designed to significantly reduce the gap between different input methods.
Successful games like Apex Legends and Call of Duty have proven that properly implementing Aim Assist can enhance the experience without compromising competitive integrity.
Challenges of Cross-Play (Mouse & Keyboard vs. Controller):

Mouse and keyboard players often blame controller players for team losses due to perceived weaker aiming performance.
A strong Aim Assist system can greatly improve controller players’ performance, leading to a more enjoyable and balanced experience for everyone.
Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist:

It’s essential to correct the misconception that Aim Assist is a form of "cheating." It is simply a tool to address the inherent disadvantages of using controllers.
Developers who designed this system are not "stupid"; they are experts who understand the dynamics of gameplay and the importance of balance between different methods.
The design of Aim Assist is based on precise criteria to ensure it promotes fairness and doesn’t provide an undeserved advantage.
The Role of Developers in Creating Fair Experiences:

The efforts of developers to improve gameplay systems should be respected instead of being dismissed as ruining competition.
These developers spend years crafting balanced games that satisfy everyone, and it is unreasonable for someone to dismiss their work by labeling Aim Assist as a cheat.
Practical Suggestions:

Provide adjustable settings for Aim Assist to suit players’ preferences and skill levels.
Implement separate matchmaking queues based on input methods to ensure fairer matches.
The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity:

The primary goal is to provide a fair and enjoyable experience for all players, regardless of their chosen input method.
Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base, potentially harming the game’s health and longevity.
This comment highlights the importance of Aim Assist and demonstrates that it is not only a necessity for fairness but also an integral part of developers' strategies to make games inclusive and balanced. It’s about inclusivity, fairness, and fostering a better gaming experience for everyone.

[Cult Leader]

At least I had a good chuckle this AM.

[Cult Leader]

Originally posted by MR-Ghost:

I have written a comprehensive comment about the importance of adding effective support for Aim Assist for players using controllers in competitive games. The comment focuses on the necessity of balancing controller players with mouse and keyboard users while addressing common misconceptions. Here are the main points:

Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard:

The mouse offers unmatched precision and responsiveness, with the ability to easily adjust DPI and settings.
On the other hand, controllers rely on analog sticks, making aiming more challenging and less accurate.
Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism:

Aim Assist is not an unfair advantage; it is a tool designed to significantly reduce the gap between different input methods.
Successful games like Apex Legends and Call of Duty have proven that properly implementing Aim Assist can enhance the experience without compromising competitive integrity.
Challenges of Cross-Play (Mouse & Keyboard vs. Controller):

Mouse and keyboard players often blame controller players for team losses due to perceived weaker aiming performance.
A strong Aim Assist system can greatly improve controller players’ performance, leading to a more enjoyable and balanced experience for everyone.
Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist:

It’s essential to correct the misconception that Aim Assist is a form of "cheating." It is simply a tool to address the inherent disadvantages of using controllers.
Developers who designed this system are not "stupid"; they are experts who understand the dynamics of gameplay and the importance of balance between different methods.
The design of Aim Assist is based on precise criteria to ensure it promotes fairness and doesn’t provide an undeserved advantage.
The Role of Developers in Creating Fair Experiences:

The efforts of developers to improve gameplay systems should be respected instead of being dismissed as ruining competition.
These developers spend years crafting balanced games that satisfy everyone, and it is unreasonable for someone to dismiss their work by labeling Aim Assist as a cheat.
Practical Suggestions:

Provide adjustable settings for Aim Assist to suit players’ preferences and skill levels.
Implement separate matchmaking queues based on input methods to ensure fairer matches.
The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity:

The primary goal is to provide a fair and enjoyable experience for all players, regardless of their chosen input method.
Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base, potentially harming the game’s health and longevity.
This comment highlights the importance of Aim Assist and demonstrates that it is not only a necessity for fairness but also an integral part of developers' strategies to make games inclusive and balanced. It’s about inclusivity, fairness, and fostering a better gaming experience for everyone.

1. "Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard"
Yes, we get it—mice are like laser-guided precision tools, while controllers are the Swiss Army knives of gaming. But if we're talking about "challenges," let’s not forget that mouse users also face their own struggles, like having to pause for snacks mid-match. Controller users, on the other hand, can snack and play simultaneously—clearly the superior life hack.
2. "Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism"
Calling Aim Assist a "balancing mechanism" is like calling training wheels a "cycling enhancement system." Let’s not overcomplicate things. Nobody’s saying it’s cheating, but maybe don’t expect applause when the training wheels help you nail a perfect drift.
3. "Challenges of Cross-Play"
Cross-play challenges? Oh, you mean the eternal blame game: "We lost because of Aim Assist!" versus "We lost because the mouse player was hopped up on Mountain Dew!" Truly, Shakespearean drama. Maybe the real challenge isn’t Aim Assist but the fragility of our collective gamer egos.
4. "Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist"
"Aim Assist isn’t cheating," you say. Of course not! It’s more like having a GPS for aiming—convenient, sure, but it doesn’t mean you know the road any better. Meanwhile, developers are the real MVPs for designing a system that lets you feel like a sniper even when your thumbs are out here vibing.
5. "The Role of Developers"
Developers deserve credit, yes, but let’s not turn them into saints. They’re also the ones who decided your gun should have the recoil of a toddler with a fire hose. Let’s respect their choices while admitting they’ve given us Aim Assist as a gift of mercy.
6. "Practical Suggestions"
Adjustable Aim Assist settings? Great idea—because nothing says “balanced gameplay” like tuning the game to your personal preferences. Next up: matchmaking based on who’s had their coffee yet, because fairness knows no bounds.
7. "The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity"
"Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base." True, but let’s not pretend this is a humanitarian crisis. This is gaming, where the biggest divide isn’t controller vs. mouse—it’s pineapple on pizza vs. not.

[RB6]

Originally posted by (o(o.(o.(o.O).o).o)o):

Originally posted by MR-Ghost:

I have written a comprehensive comment about the importance of adding effective support for Aim Assist for players using controllers in competitive games. The comment focuses on the necessity of balancing controller players with mouse and keyboard users while addressing common misconceptions. Here are the main points:

Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard:

The mouse offers unmatched precision and responsiveness, with the ability to easily adjust DPI and settings.
On the other hand, controllers rely on analog sticks, making aiming more challenging and less accurate.
Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism:

Aim Assist is not an unfair advantage; it is a tool designed to significantly reduce the gap between different input methods.
Successful games like Apex Legends and Call of Duty have proven that properly implementing Aim Assist can enhance the experience without compromising competitive integrity.
Challenges of Cross-Play (Mouse & Keyboard vs. Controller):

Mouse and keyboard players often blame controller players for team losses due to perceived weaker aiming performance.
A strong Aim Assist system can greatly improve controller players’ performance, leading to a more enjoyable and balanced experience for everyone.
Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist:

It’s essential to correct the misconception that Aim Assist is a form of "cheating." It is simply a tool to address the inherent disadvantages of using controllers.
Developers who designed this system are not "stupid"; they are experts who understand the dynamics of gameplay and the importance of balance between different methods.
The design of Aim Assist is based on precise criteria to ensure it promotes fairness and doesn’t provide an undeserved advantage.
The Role of Developers in Creating Fair Experiences:

The efforts of developers to improve gameplay systems should be respected instead of being dismissed as ruining competition.
These developers spend years crafting balanced games that satisfy everyone, and it is unreasonable for someone to dismiss their work by labeling Aim Assist as a cheat.
Practical Suggestions:

Provide adjustable settings for Aim Assist to suit players’ preferences and skill levels.
Implement separate matchmaking queues based on input methods to ensure fairer matches.
The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity:

The primary goal is to provide a fair and enjoyable experience for all players, regardless of their chosen input method.
Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base, potentially harming the game’s health and longevity.
This comment highlights the importance of Aim Assist and demonstrates that it is not only a necessity for fairness but also an integral part of developers' strategies to make games inclusive and balanced. It’s about inclusivity, fairness, and fostering a better gaming experience for everyone.

1. "Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard"
Yes, we get it—mice are like laser-guided precision tools, while controllers are the Swiss Army knives of gaming. But if we're talking about "challenges," let’s not forget that mouse users also face their own struggles, like having to pause for snacks mid-match. Controller users, on the other hand, can snack and play simultaneously—clearly the superior life hack.
2. "Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism"
Calling Aim Assist a "balancing mechanism" is like calling training wheels a "cycling enhancement system." Let’s not overcomplicate things. Nobody’s saying it’s cheating, but maybe don’t expect applause when the training wheels help you nail a perfect drift.
3. "Challenges of Cross-Play"
Cross-play challenges? Oh, you mean the eternal blame game: "We lost because of Aim Assist!" versus "We lost because the mouse player was hopped up on Mountain Dew!" Truly, Shakespearean drama. Maybe the real challenge isn’t Aim Assist but the fragility of our collective gamer egos.
4. "Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist"
"Aim Assist isn’t cheating," you say. Of course not! It’s more like having a GPS for aiming—convenient, sure, but it doesn’t mean you know the road any better. Meanwhile, developers are the real MVPs for designing a system that lets you feel like a sniper even when your thumbs are out here vibing.
5. "The Role of Developers"
Developers deserve credit, yes, but let’s not turn them into saints. They’re also the ones who decided your gun should have the recoil of a toddler with a fire hose. Let’s respect their choices while admitting they’ve given us Aim Assist as a gift of mercy.
6. "Practical Suggestions"
Adjustable Aim Assist settings? Great idea—because nothing says “balanced gameplay” like tuning the game to your personal preferences. Next up: matchmaking based on who’s had their coffee yet, because fairness knows no bounds.
7. "The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity"
"Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base." True, but let’s not pretend this is a humanitarian crisis. This is gaming, where the biggest divide isn’t controller vs. mouse—it’s pineapple on pizza vs. not.

:csgoanarchist:

I understand that you believe mouse and keyboard are the superior way to play games, but does that mean anyone using a controller should just accept being at a disadvantage? Games aren’t designed to favor one playstyle or device they’re meant to bring everyone together, regardless of their setup or preferences.
Aim assist isn’t cheating; it’s simply a way to balance the significant gap between the precision of a mouse and the thumbstick on a controller. A mouse offers pixel-perfect accuracy, while a controller relies on fine motor skills. If you think aim assist provides an unfair advantage, perhaps you haven’t experienced how challenging it is for controller players to match the speed and accuracy of a mouse.
Many mouse and keyboard players complain about losing mixed matches, claiming that controllers are the reason. But if that’s true, why don’t we see such claims in professional tournaments where no assists are used? Perhaps the issue isn’t the technology but the strategies being employed.
At its core, gaming thrives on diversity diversity in devices, playstyles, and players. Why does it bother you if a controller player gets a fair chance to compete? Instead of complaining about aim assist, maybe it’s better to focus on improving your personal skills and adapting to different playstyles.
Lastly, let’s be realistic. The developers who designed aim assist aren’t less intelligent than us. These are professionals who’ve spent years researching and refining gameplay to enhance the experience for everyone. Aim assist wasn’t designed to make things easy it was designed to make games fair, where everyone can enjoy the experience.
Games aren’t a battleground for devices; they’re a space for creativity and enjoyment. If you’re confident in your skills, there’s no need to worry about aim assist or anything else. But if your focus is solely on criticizing this feature, maybe the issue isn’t with the game it’s with how you’re approaching it as a player.

[KjngRaptor]

Originally posted by MR-Ghost:

Originally posted by (o(o.(o.(o.O).o).o)o):

1. "Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard"
Yes, we get it—mice are like laser-guided precision tools, while controllers are the Swiss Army knives of gaming. But if we're talking about "challenges," let’s not forget that mouse users also face their own struggles, like having to pause for snacks mid-match. Controller users, on the other hand, can snack and play simultaneously—clearly the superior life hack.
2. "Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism"
Calling Aim Assist a "balancing mechanism" is like calling training wheels a "cycling enhancement system." Let’s not overcomplicate things. Nobody’s saying it’s cheating, but maybe don’t expect applause when the training wheels help you nail a perfect drift.
3. "Challenges of Cross-Play"
Cross-play challenges? Oh, you mean the eternal blame game: "We lost because of Aim Assist!" versus "We lost because the mouse player was hopped up on Mountain Dew!" Truly, Shakespearean drama. Maybe the real challenge isn’t Aim Assist but the fragility of our collective gamer egos.
4. "Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist"
"Aim Assist isn’t cheating," you say. Of course not! It’s more like having a GPS for aiming—convenient, sure, but it doesn’t mean you know the road any better. Meanwhile, developers are the real MVPs for designing a system that lets you feel like a sniper even when your thumbs are out here vibing.
5. "The Role of Developers"
Developers deserve credit, yes, but let’s not turn them into saints. They’re also the ones who decided your gun should have the recoil of a toddler with a fire hose. Let’s respect their choices while admitting they’ve given us Aim Assist as a gift of mercy.
6. "Practical Suggestions"
Adjustable Aim Assist settings? Great idea—because nothing says “balanced gameplay” like tuning the game to your personal preferences. Next up: matchmaking based on who’s had their coffee yet, because fairness knows no bounds.
7. "The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity"
"Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base." True, but let’s not pretend this is a humanitarian crisis. This is gaming, where the biggest divide isn’t controller vs. mouse—it’s pineapple on pizza vs. not.

:csgoanarchist:

I understand that you believe mouse and keyboard are the superior way to play games, but does that mean anyone using a controller should just accept being at a disadvantage? Aim assist isn’t cheating; it’s simply a way to balance the significant gap between the precision of a mouse and the thumbstick on a controller. A mouse offers pixel-perfect accuracy, while a controller relies on fine motor skills. If you think aim assist provides an unfair advantage, perhaps you haven’t experienced how challenging it is for controller players to match the speed and accuracy of a mouse.

Nah, people just suck, I've been playing games since they were on floppy disks, my ass was playing OG doom as a kid..... I played with controller for the longest time, went to keyboard and mouse and sure.... maybe you and me both prefer it over controller for shooters but.... I've got fam who stuck with controller and they are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ crack-shot with a controller.

Depends on the person, I prefer controller for hack n slash/fighters but.... hasn't stopped me from beating down people in those kinds of games using a keyboard.

End of they day.... you have one method of playing that has assistance which.... you put that in the hands of a person with a lot of skill.... they're gonna have an unfair advantage.

You just can't see it because you're bias towards keyboard and mouse, haven't played with folks on controller who slap in shooters.

[RB6]

Originally posted by KjngRaptor:

Originally posted by MR-Ghost:

I understand that you believe mouse and keyboard are the superior way to play games, but does that mean anyone using a controller should just accept being at a disadvantage? Aim assist isn’t cheating; it’s simply a way to balance the significant gap between the precision of a mouse and the thumbstick on a controller. A mouse offers pixel-perfect accuracy, while a controller relies on fine motor skills. If you think aim assist provides an unfair advantage, perhaps you haven’t experienced how challenging it is for controller players to match the speed and accuracy of a mouse.

Nah, people just suck, I've been playing games since they were on floppy disks, my ass was playing OG doom as a kid..... I played with controller for the longest time, went to keyboard and mouse and sure.... maybe you and me both prefer it over controller for shooters but.... I've got fam who stuck with controller and they are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ crack-shot with a controller.

Depends on the person, I prefer controller for hack n slash/fighters but.... hasn't stopped me from beating down people in those kinds of games using a keyboard.

End of they day.... you have one method of playing that has assistance which.... you put that in the hands of a person with a lot of skill.... they're gonna have an unfair advantage.

You just can't see it because you're bias towards keyboard and mouse, haven't played with folks on controller who slap in shooters.

You’re right that skill is the key factor, but we can’t overlook that the difference between the tools is not just a matter of personal preference it fundamentally impacts the gaming experience. The controller, while preferred by many, doesn’t offer the same precision as a mouse and keyboard. Aim assist isn’t just a feature, it’s a tool to bridge that gap and ensure game balance. Of course, there are professionals who use controllers, but that doesn’t mean all players can reach the same level easily. Aim assist allows everyone, regardless of input method, to compete on equal terms. In the end, the goal is to create a fun and balanced experience for all, not to have a significant disparity between different gaming tools

[SB]

Originally posted by dK:

If you need aim assist youre just bad and shouldnt even play the game, get good and play MK

brother every shooter that supports controller has aim assist. Mnk players have a massive advantage with no aim assist, the very least they can do is add it to level the playing field.

[Graybush]

Originally posted by SB:

Originally posted by dK:

If you need aim assist youre just bad and shouldnt even play the game, get good and play MK

brother every shooter that supports controller has aim assist. Mnk players have a massive advantage with no aim assist, the very least they can do is add it to level the playing field.

Not every shooter. Overwatch 2 PC gamepad has zero aim assist.

[Squirt Cabana]

Trying to fiddle with aim assist or any other such systems will be neverending cat and mouse where one will always have an advantage. There are ofc always people trying to game the system, for example, half-controller on the left hand and mouse on the right or elite controllers with pedals.

Only way to balance matches properly is to have input based matchmaking.

[i like em young]

Originally posted by KjngRaptor:

Originally posted by MR-Ghost:

I understand that you believe mouse and keyboard are the superior way to play games, but does that mean anyone using a controller should just accept being at a disadvantage? Aim assist isn’t cheating; it’s simply a way to balance the significant gap between the precision of a mouse and the thumbstick on a controller. A mouse offers pixel-perfect accuracy, while a controller relies on fine motor skills. If you think aim assist provides an unfair advantage, perhaps you haven’t experienced how challenging it is for controller players to match the speed and accuracy of a mouse.

Nah, people just suck, I've been playing games since they were on floppy disks, my ass was playing OG doom as a kid..... I played with controller for the longest time, went to keyboard and mouse and sure.... maybe you and me both prefer it over controller for shooters but.... I've got fam who stuck with controller and they are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ crack-shot with a controller.

Depends on the person, I prefer controller for hack n slash/fighters but.... hasn't stopped me from beating down people in those kinds of games using a keyboard.

End of they day.... you have one method of playing that has assistance which.... you put that in the hands of a person with a lot of skill.... they're gonna have an unfair advantage.

You just can't see it because you're bias towards keyboard and mouse, haven't played with folks on controller who slap in shooters.

if u think ur buddy is a cracked controller aimer, tell him to get "quake live" and join a vampiric lightninggun only server


https://youtu.be/DcgQMzZc4Go?feature=shared

[Vish]

Originally posted by MR-Ghost:

I have written a comprehensive comment about the importance of adding effective support for Aim Assist for players using controllers in competitive games. The comment focuses on the necessity of balancing controller players with mouse and keyboard users while addressing common misconceptions. Here are the main points:

Fundamental Differences Between Controllers and Mouse & Keyboard:

The mouse offers unmatched precision and responsiveness, with the ability to easily adjust DPI and settings.
On the other hand, controllers rely on analog sticks, making aiming more challenging and less accurate.
Aim Assist as a Balancing Mechanism:

Aim Assist is not an unfair advantage; it is a tool designed to significantly reduce the gap between different input methods.
Successful games like Apex Legends and Call of Duty have proven that properly implementing Aim Assist can enhance the experience without compromising competitive integrity.
Challenges of Cross-Play (Mouse & Keyboard vs. Controller):

Mouse and keyboard players often blame controller players for team losses due to perceived weaker aiming performance.
A strong Aim Assist system can greatly improve controller players’ performance, leading to a more enjoyable and balanced experience for everyone.
Breaking the Stigma Around Aim Assist:

It’s essential to correct the misconception that Aim Assist is a form of "cheating." It is simply a tool to address the inherent disadvantages of using controllers.
Developers who designed this system are not "stupid"; they are experts who understand the dynamics of gameplay and the importance of balance between different methods.
The design of Aim Assist is based on precise criteria to ensure it promotes fairness and doesn’t provide an undeserved advantage.
The Role of Developers in Creating Fair Experiences:

The efforts of developers to improve gameplay systems should be respected instead of being dismissed as ruining competition.
These developers spend years crafting balanced games that satisfy everyone, and it is unreasonable for someone to dismiss their work by labeling Aim Assist as a cheat.
Practical Suggestions:

Provide adjustable settings for Aim Assist to suit players’ preferences and skill levels.
Implement separate matchmaking queues based on input methods to ensure fairer matches.
The Bigger Picture – Community and Inclusivity:

The primary goal is to provide a fair and enjoyable experience for all players, regardless of their chosen input method.
Ignoring the needs of controller players isolates a significant portion of the player base, potentially harming the game’s health and longevity.
This comment highlights the importance of Aim Assist and demonstrates that it is not only a necessity for fairness but also an integral part of developers' strategies to make games inclusive and balanced. It’s about inclusivity, fairness, and fostering a better gaming experience for everyone.

It looks like a chat gpt answer