Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It makes me think of the classification for draconic creatures. Dragons have two wings on their bodies and four individual limbs/legs and a distinct tail. Wyverns have two hind legs, tail, and their wings are their front legs/limbs. Both are draconic. To the lay man, both are dragons as dragon is the most socially known (not acceptable, but known) word. Is it really so wrong to call a draconic creature a dragon despite it being a wyvern? Unless, of course, draconic is considered a class like mammals and reptiles. Then the distinction is more important.
Well, you don't call a tortoise a turtle, or a turtle a tortoise. They're distinct. Yet, all tortoises are turtles, but not all turtles are tortoises. So, you could call a tortoise a turtle. All squares are rectangles, not all rectangles are squares. In casual context where the distinction doesn't affect the meaning or impact of the creature or object existing, how much does it matter to be right? And how does one correct someone else that a dragon is actually a wyvern? Do most people know wyverns and dragons like they do turtles and tortoises?
Person A: "Uh, it's actually a wyvern. It's so obvious by it's winged limbs."
Person B: "Fun fact, this is a wyvern. Basically a dragon, but [casual explanantion]."
Person A sounds annoying. Person B is sharing a fun fact. Neither needed to share. Does revealing the truth enhance the fun of the person enraptured by the fire-breathing draconic creature? If not, how necessary is it?
So, if I see someone casting spells, my immediate thought is wizard. No thinking. That's just the first word. Upon thinking, I can find the classification. But if someone calls Strange a wizard in front of me, does that bother me? And if so, why? Is the correction necessary?
In conclusion, I don't know whose vision is better for I don't know their visions. I think classifications/labels are important, but context matters regarding how necessary it is to follow or declare a classification so strictly. The average person doesn't care about these distinctions. Does that mean we shouldn't? No. Strange is still a sorcerer, and his powers are wizard.
"Jarvis, don't forget to destroy this local economy."
I like comics. More pictures, fewer words.