Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's also the first game of this caliber for the studio, compared to Overwatch which is made Blizzard with years of experience making games. Also originally Overwatch was designed for weaker hardware.
On laptop with a 3050, I found that just keeping textures on ultra and everything else low still looks great and lets you keep stable 80 FPS.
there's only one game i can think of that runs well for the graphics it provides in UE5, The Finals. Maybe also RE2 remake but that's a strong maybe.
that would require editing the Unreal Engine 5 code. They probably don't have much expertise on it or don't see it as a priority.
NetEase is actually a massive corporation. Parent company isn't even a video game company. In these massive organizations, time is spent and scheduled from higher ups and project managers. Optimising a video game engine they don't own is hard work. Would take months to make a meaningful optimisation and the worst part is the return is low.
The high ups at NetEase Parent probably don't even know rivals exists
You mean subjectively...