Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That said, I wouldn't worry about it too much. If you're playing really well, but not getting the MVP because someone else is playing even better, you're probably winning.
I'd say, don't stress much about becoming MVP and just do your thing and improve your game play, focus on what's important - team play and you will get there eventually. I will take a match win over any MVP, esp if we all played well as a team.
granted the easier way is to play vanguard who can easily take kills and just grief hoping your team does not lose objectives while you hunt MVP instead of objectives. the second option is more likely to give you MVP but its also more likely to make you lose so if you are happy with SVPs then do that
For example, in a capture map, use your mobility to dive past the point and set up in an enclosed space while constantly harassing, provoking them to come to your nest. If they ignore you, then your mines and damaged output can destroy their backline. If they attack you, your team will have an advantage in attacking them from another angle. Regardless, a lot of damage and high survival ability.
IMHO, MVP/SVP is overrated. As long as holding actual objective doesn't give you any points towards those MVP-awards, system itself is flawed. MVP system at current state encourages bad playing patterns, as many people completely go too greedily after capturing point, and cause you lose already won game that way.
i do need to defend my title of devils advocate and nitpick (but thats all that is, just a nitpick, thats how much i agree with the comment lmao)
a good tank in 1-2-3 team with 3 competent healers who know how to protect themselves while keeping tank alive... im just saying, in this particular scenario solo vanguard gets mvp more often than duelists but even this nitpick dont really provide any solid argument against anything you said because you said "almost" so 10/10 comment, i feel defeated as devils advocate lmao :P
Support > Duelist > Vanguard
Because, I feel like, all the game does is add up numbers.
Duelists and Tanks can't earn assists as easily, so they already dont get that, they usually cant heal, meaning they dont get that either.
Tanks get Damage Blocked instead, but usually have less Damage Output/Kills, meaning Duelists trump them in both categories.
So, yeah. The only way for you to get MVP on Vanguard is to either be significantly better than the rest of your team.