Just because it has more HP doesn't mean it's a Tank

[Archaux (ESP)]

So you go and call it "Vanguard". High CD and shields with low absortion capacity. But they take the same amount of damage than any other character. In fact, all characters take the same amount of damage. Also some of them (if not all of them) have too high damage.

The point I'm trying to make is:
> Why would no one pick a vanguard to protect others or defend the position? I wouldn't, despite I love assuming tank and support roles. But, let me be clear, VANGUARDS ARE NOT TANKS, they are warriors. There is a huge difference.

I feel like MR basically skipped all the good seasons from OW1 and dived stright into the horrendous 3-3 point of no return [People who pick buffed tanks just want to dps]. I don't think they are bad roles, but they are not what a proper tank should be (high defense, low dps and maybe slower movement in comparison with other roles —despite there's no default sprint for all characters, which is ridiculous, but that's a thing for another day—).

Might sound crazy, but I think that's why atacking/pushing the Payload is easier than defending it (and yet the payload's speed when pushing is way faster than when backing/defending).

Tank you for reading. I will listen what you have to say about this.