Game needs vote to kick & more aggressive AFK timeout

[kw0lf.tw]

There are too many AFKs. Vote to surrender is not enough. Game needs:

1. Vote to kick. Unanimous vote of the rest of the team kicks a player from a quick match.
2. More aggressive AFK timer. If player does not leave the initial starting area within 30 seconds, they should be kicked.

Game doing great, lots of fun, but too many people abusing AFK right now. Spoils it for everyone.

[id795078477]

As long as they implement opt-out from backfilling, sure, go have at the vote-kick.

[kw0lf.tw]

Originally posted by id795078477:

As long as they implement opt-out from backfilling, sure, go have at the vote-kick.

Oh, 100% ... I hate joining a match that's 99% over.

The dynamics of this game as far as people dropping is crazy. I think when a lot of people drop from a team, it backfills with higher ranked/leveled players. So many matches go win-loss-loss because all the bad players drop from the initial team.

[id795078477]

Originally posted by omgjpalol:

Originally posted by id795078477:

As long as they implement opt-out from backfilling, sure, go have at the vote-kick.

Oh, 100% ... I hate joining a match that's 99% over.

The dynamics of this game as far as people dropping is crazy. I think when a lot of people drop from a team, it backfills with higher ranked/leveled players. So many matches go win-loss-loss because all the bad players drop from the initial team.

Oh. I expected some strong opposition, but okay, then I say = the vast, vast majority of players will just opt-out from backfill. Who wants to play someone else's leftovers, which is almost guaranteed to be a losing match?

Meaning: the vote-kick coupled with backfill opt-out will be a terrible idea. It would be almost a guaranteed "we now play 5v6" sort of a call. So people will quickly realize that and never agree to kick someone unless they're actively sabotaging their team.

[Jesi]

I agree with AFK timeout and disconnections... guys pushed payload half the map till game got cancelled. It was a waste of time for both teams.

[kw0lf.tw]

Originally posted by id795078477:

Originally posted by omgjpalol:

Oh, 100% ... I hate joining a match that's 99% over.

The dynamics of this game as far as people dropping is crazy. I think when a lot of people drop from a team, it backfills with higher ranked/leveled players. So many matches go win-loss-loss because all the bad players drop from the initial team.

Oh. I expected some strong opposition, but okay, then I say = the vast, vast majority of players will just opt-out from backfill. Who wants to play someone else's leftovers, which is almost guaranteed to be a losing match?

Meaning: the vote-kick coupled with backfill opt-out will be a terrible idea. It would be almost a guaranteed "we now play 5v6" sort of a call. So people will quickly realize that and never agree to kick someone unless they're actively sabotaging their team.

They just need more aggressive deserter penalties (intentional disconnects). People need to learn to take their medicine (or surrender). Deserting is for losers.

[HouseParty420]

I think YOU, need to learn to play the game correctly.
If you're getting AFK's, CONSISTANTLY, then you are more than likely a trash player.
Learn to play and maybe people won't AFK in your matches, or better yet...
Don't play ranked when you're just bad and refusing to get good.