Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'd argue you should treat him like a vanguard for the purposes of picking roles. He fulfills the role of a vanguard when he's on your team.
i agree, except he can be a frontliner better than most dps because of how long he can survive on the frontlines and be in the enemies face
Mr. F is in a weird place and needs some adjustments.
For example, Mr. F should've been classified as Duelist/Vanguard.
And when they inevitably add a strategist that deals a bit too much damage, they can just classify them as Strategist/Duelist and avoid all this discourse and confusion.