Store Page
Marvel Rivals
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

Marvel Rivals

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
EmperorVolo Jan 19 @ 11:53am
There's this idea that 3 supports is really good.
It's not it's ok.

1 Vanguard, 2 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 45.96%
2 Vanguard, 1 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 41.67%

A NORMAL COMP of 2,2,2 = 52.67%

https://rivalstracker.com/team-comps

I don't know what it is but some people think this is some sort of secret meta. It's not.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Clovert Jan 19 @ 11:57am 
Triple support really relies on good ult rotation and team coordination so it's mostly optimal at the highest level of play.

Sadly the majority of users are not at that level of play so of course 2-2-2 is gonna have better percentage of wins.
#1
mozzarxlla Jan 19 @ 11:58am 
theyre just hanging on to whatever argument they can use against role q
#2
toasted Jan 19 @ 11:58am 
the site you linked has no data from high ranks, of course low ranks running it don't do it properly
#3
Syrin Jan 19 @ 12:05pm 
Because at the very highest level with the most elite and skilled players in the entire world, some are doing triple support.
#4
Sacred)(Rhaine Jan 19 @ 12:08pm 
How does it even work? most teams that face 3 supps end up having to also play 3 supps.
#5
Mochan Jan 19 @ 12:10pm 
Originally posted by EmperorVolo:
It's not it's ok.

1 Vanguard, 2 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 45.96%
2 Vanguard, 1 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 41.67%

A NORMAL COMP of 2,2,2 = 52.67%

https://rivalstracker.com/team-comps

I don't know what it is but some people think this is some sort of secret meta. It's not.

It's not a secret meta. It's just really good. good enough that it wins 45% of the time.
#6
Millertyme Jan 19 @ 12:11pm 
Originally posted by EmperorVolo:
It's not it's ok.

1 Vanguard, 2 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 45.96%
2 Vanguard, 1 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 41.67%

A NORMAL COMP of 2,2,2 = 52.67%

https://rivalstracker.com/team-comps

I don't know what it is but some people think this is some sort of secret meta. It's not.
Do these % account for the different ranks? Or is it all players all ranks?
#7
Mochan Jan 19 @ 12:18pm 
Originally posted by Millertyme:
Originally posted by EmperorVolo:
It's not it's ok.

1 Vanguard, 2 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 45.96%
2 Vanguard, 1 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 41.67%

A NORMAL COMP of 2,2,2 = 52.67%

https://rivalstracker.com/team-comps

I don't know what it is but some people think this is some sort of secret meta. It's not.
Do these % account for the different ranks? Or is it all players all ranks?

It's all ranks all modes all players for the sample that shared their profile with the tracker.
#8
Clovert Jan 19 @ 12:18pm 
Originally posted by Millertyme:
Originally posted by EmperorVolo:
It's not it's ok.

1 Vanguard, 2 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 45.96%
2 Vanguard, 1 Duelist, 3 Strategist = 41.67%

A NORMAL COMP of 2,2,2 = 52.67%

https://rivalstracker.com/team-comps

I don't know what it is but some people think this is some sort of secret meta. It's not.
Do these % account for the different ranks? Or is it all players all ranks?
On the website it's all ranks by default but you can also sort them by rank.
#9
Valor Jan 19 @ 12:23pm 
I love this, because it's like saying it's not will make it a reality lmao.

It is, and this is why people are asking for role queue and why OW2 did Role Queue, because the 3 tank and 3 support meta was ruining ranked.

Originally posted by EmperorVolo:
I don't know what it is but some people think this is some sort of secret meta. It's not.


Again, mostly just wanted to point out how funny it was to say "it's not" when it is lol
#10
SoloQ Jan 19 @ 12:36pm 
They really should start teaching statistics and data analysis in high school because this hurts. You're using two massively different sized data pools. One has 100+ thousand matches while the other doesn't even have 30k. You're basically comparing cherry tomatoes to watermelons.
It's fine to make your own hypothesis but this doesn't actually prove anything.
#11
RobAlca Jan 19 @ 12:38pm 
people dont understand that even if 2-2-2 is enforced they will still lose the matches

cause skill issue
#12
Krunkford Jan 19 @ 12:41pm 
It comes from OW, sort of. The composition would be 3-0-3. It would be essentially GOATS a sustain comp where you just outlast your enemy through massive levels of heals and sustainability on point. It doesn't work without tanks to pump the sustain healing into. you don't want to run anymore than MAYBE 1 DPS player with 3 supports. otherwise its pointless.
Last edited by Krunkford; Jan 19 @ 12:42pm
#13
Mitrovarr Jan 19 @ 12:45pm 
I've had people try to talk me into this in low rank qp. Like, we'll just get stomped if you try that. I've seen 5 dps win more often than 3 supports.
#14
Mitrovarr Jan 19 @ 12:47pm 
Originally posted by RobAlca:
people dont understand that even if 2-2-2 is enforced they will still lose the matches

cause skill issue

I mean, that's not the point. I want enforced team comps so that:
1. I never have to tank against my will ever again.
2. I can play DPS sometimes if I want without having a horrible team comp because I'm not filling.

I've had a pretty crap day of matches. I've had to fill tank twice and both went horribly (nothing like a tank player that doesn't know how to play tank, doesn't want to play tank, and is angry at the rest of the team for having to play tank) and every time I tried to DPS we had a stupid comp and I either had to desist or just ride the stupid train to loseville.
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Marvel Rivals > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: Jan 19 @ 11:53am
Posts: 21

Discussions Rules and Guidelines