Prince of Persia... Why is he African? Persians ain't black.

[ᛁᛖᛊᚢᛊ ᚨᚱ ᚷᚢᛞ]

Title

[Neuromonada]

To meet engagement metrics and save on ads thanks to people like you. You are a free workforce my man.

[Exceptional player]

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

Title

He identifies a Persian. That's about it. That's all it takes.

[Shaqiloheal]

Escrito originalmente por Exceptional player:

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

Title

He identifies a Persian. That's about it. That's all it takes.

You cant identify as a race. The very same goes for gender too

[Exceptional player]

Escrito originalmente por Shaqiloheal:

Escrito originalmente por Exceptional player:

He identifies a Persian. That's about it. That's all it takes.

You cant identify as a race. The very same goes for gender too

Careful, you'll hurt Ubisoft's feelings.

[akhsavi]

because Ubisoft truly believes that making Persian or Japanese black is a sign of equality and inclusivity and not an insult to Persians or Japanese - yes, Ubi are morons what other reasons do you need

[Squirrel With Acorn]

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

Escrito originalmente por Purple:

Because you are one of the immortals, an elite group of warriors gathered from across the entire Persian Empire, which did extend into Ethopia, Somalia, and you go on a mission to rescue the kidnapped Prince of Persia.

And the Prince is Persian. Persians have wide range of skin tones, and they'll even get tanner when outside wearing no shirt and no head covering. Sargons skin color matches that of Persians, even with the tan it still with in Persian skin tones.

The immortals existed in the Sassanid period as well...

There are far to many things in this game that points it to being around 500BC

In the game the recent king, that died not to long before the game started is based on King Darius I, even describes this king Darius in the game as doing the same things as the real king Darius did. King Darius was the king of Persia around 500BC

The queen of Persia is based on the warrior queen who killed one of the kings of Persia empire, again around 500BC.

The immortals are elite warriors in the game also existed in real life around 500BC.

Persepolis is the capital of the Persian empire in the game, built by Darius. The real life Persepolis was also built by King Darius, around 500BC and abandoned around 300bc.

Kingdom of Kush was under rule by the Persians around 500BC, same in this game.

Immortals in the 500BCs were infantry, on foot soldiers. Where as the immortals in the 200ad were a calvary, soldiers on horses. In this game they are an infantry.

[ᛁᛖᛊᚢᛊ ᚨᚱ ᚷᚢᛞ]

Escrito originalmente por Purple:

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

The immortals existed in the Sassanid period as well...

There are far to many things in this game that points it to being around 500BC

In the game the recent king, that died not to long before the game started is based on King Darius I, even describes this king Darius in the game as doing the same things as the real king Darius did. King Darius was the king of Persia around 500BC

The queen of Persia is based on the warrior queen who killed one of the kings of Persia empire, again around 500BC.

The immortals are elite warriors in the game also existed in real life around 500BC.

Persepolis is the capital of the Persian empire in the game, built by Darius. The real life Persepolis was also built by King Darius, around 500BC and abandoned around 300bc.

Kingdom of Kush was under rule by the Persians around 500BC, same in this game.

Immortals in the 500BCs were infantry, on foot soldiers. Where as the immortals in the 200ad were a calvary, soldiers on horses. In this game they are an infantry.

The Kushan Empire is alive.
The immortals existed in the Sassanid period.

You are only speculating and making up connections where there are none. You are probably one step away from joining the tinfoil hats. I wonder what other "theories" you believe in.

You are seeing things that aren't there, lying to yourself just so that you don't have to admit that you are capping

[Eck]

He looks like Will Smith's son.
Or daughter. Whatever, celebrities' children change sex so much these days. (all of their own personal accord of course!)

[Pokemastuh]

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

Title

https://youtu.be/V4h3UpyQjxw

[Sgt. Pepper]

I think game good.

[Squirrel With Acorn]

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

Escrito originalmente por Purple:

There are far to many things in this game that points it to being around 500BC

In the game the recent king, that died not to long before the game started is based on King Darius I, even describes this king Darius in the game as doing the same things as the real king Darius did. King Darius was the king of Persia around 500BC

The queen of Persia is based on the warrior queen who killed one of the kings of Persia empire, again around 500BC.

The immortals are elite warriors in the game also existed in real life around 500BC.

Persepolis is the capital of the Persian empire in the game, built by Darius. The real life Persepolis was also built by King Darius, around 500BC and abandoned around 300bc.

Kingdom of Kush was under rule by the Persians around 500BC, same in this game.

Immortals in the 500BCs were infantry, on foot soldiers. Where as the immortals in the 200ad were a calvary, soldiers on horses. In this game they are an infantry.

The Kushan Empire is alive.
The immortals existed in the Sassanid period.

You are only speculating and making up connections where there are none. You are probably one step away from joining the tinfoil hats. I wonder what other "theories" you believe in.

You are seeing things that aren't there, lying to yourself just so that you don't have to admit that you are capping

Immortals in the Sassanid period were Horse soldiers, the ones in this game are not horse soldiers, they are foot soldiers exactly like the ones in 500bc

Persopolis was an abandoned city starting around 300BC, 500 years before the existence of Immortals of the Sassanid era. In this game Persopolis is the capital of the Persian Empire and was built by the most recent king, exactly the same as it was in real life in the 500BC.

You are the one making connections that don't make sense. You are taking a SINGLE thing in the game and saying it is definetly the 200's AD, despite the very fact that everything else in the game points it to being around 500BC.

The big list of things for the 500BC absolutely trumps your single instance of the Kushan Empire. At this point, its fair to say that the developers made a mistake in calling the enemy the Kushans when everything else in their game points to the time period of 500 BC.

[🦄 lainverse]

Let's start with the fact that the dude isn't a prince in the first place, and we somehow end up in a situation where Prince of Persia is kidnapped and require a rescue operation.
That's in the franchise, where we play as prince all the time, and he deals with everything himself, including literal gods.

The gameplay seems fine, but the plot is unappealing and against all the previous games in the series. This is a decent game, but it is not Prince of Persia.

[Maximizer]

Escrito originalmente por magicmase:

Escrito originalmente por Eternal Victory:

Your logic is impeccable,a country is "close" to another continent so naturally the population includes lots of sub-saharan Africans even though they live as far away from Persia as Romanians do.

Let's use your pristine logic here. Since Romania is the same distance from Persia as sub-saharan Africans are. That must mean that we should expect lot's of Romanian protaganists in the upcoming Prince of Persia games. Nepal is also aproximately the same distance from Iran and so is China.

So naturally we should have Chinese and Nepalese protaganists as well right?

It's not at all strange or unfitting to see them in a PERSIAN setting.

Bruuuh, you must be taking the maximum dose of copium possible. You're gonna overdose.

Like I said...know your continents...and some history would help. Much better than throwing around intelligent words like 'copium'

Persia conquered the Egyptians and their influence would have spread to surrounding countries. Meaning mixed marriages and offspring.
Now do yourself a huge favor and google where dreads originated from. Write it down so you don't forget.

You do know that after Arab conquest of Egypt no indigenous people survived - they were either slaughtered or fully assimilated, culturally and racially. Trying to shield yourself from criticism by stating something like marriages and offsprings 2000 years from when it had happened is nuts. No trace of that can ever be found. Every single Egyptian is of Arabian descent. Oh, I forgot the Timur conquest, which laid waste both in Persia AND Egypt, slaughtering everybody equally.

[Squirrel With Acorn]

Escrito originalmente por 🦄 lainverse:

Let's start with the fact that the dude isn't a prince in the first place, and we somehow end up in a situation where Prince of Persia is kidnapped and require a rescue operation.
That's in the franchise, where we play as prince all the time, and he deals with everything himself, including literal gods.

The gameplay seems fine, but the plot is unappealing and against all the previous games in the series. This is a decent game, but this is not Prince of Persia.

Against all previous games in the series? You didn't play the first Prince of Persia in 1989.

The first game that started it all, you play a white skinned and blonde hair orphan street boy that goes on a mission to save the kidnapped princess. They created a second game, a sequel to the first game that takes like like 2 weeks after the first game, and the main character is still not a Prince.

In this game, you play an orphan that was raised on the streets that was able to eventually raise up to joining the elite warriors, and you go on a mission to save the kidnapped Prince.

[Maximizer]

Escrito originalmente por Purple:

Escrito originalmente por 🦄 lainverse:

Let's start with the fact that the dude isn't a prince in the first place, and we somehow end up in a situation where Prince of Persia is kidnapped and require a rescue operation.
That's in the franchise, where we play as prince all the time, and he deals with everything himself, including literal gods.

The gameplay seems fine, but the plot is unappealing and against all the previous games in the series. This is a decent game, but this is not Prince of Persia.

Against all previous games in the series? You didn't play the first Prince of Persia in 1989.

The first game that started it all, you play a white skinned and blonde hair orphan street boy that goes on a mission to save the kidnapped princess. They created a second game, a sequel to the first game that takes like like 2 weeks after the first game, and the main character is still not a Prince.

In this game, you play an orphan that was raised on the streets that was able to eventually raise up to joining the elite warriors, and you go on a mission to save the kidnapped Prince.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_(Prince_of_Persia)