Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
you are an ignorant troll.
not getting into the age discussion, just wondering if maybe older people like these types of graphics more than ppl who grew up in the 3d era.
almost in every indie game forum with similar graphics, i check and find a troll bashing it and turns out to be less than 17.
but for this guy he has 6 hours in Mcpixel ....which is why this thread is weird
Modern games don't have the excuse of having limited resources/technology for their poor graphics and interfaces. McPixel 6 hours was probably me idling for cards, or leaving it on when I went somewhere. Plus it only cost me something like 50 cents.
The Pixel art fad is just an excuse for lazy developers and bad artists to avoid having to put any effort into their work.
if pixel art truly is (fading)
then people wont buy anymore pixelated games
and IGN Pcgamer and all the famous reviewers wont even bother reviewing these games
so its 2
buy the game or get out
OP is an idiot, next.