Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
hahaha.
hahahahahahahahahaa.
No.
It took EA what? 20 years to crowbar their hands off origin and give it to us here where they would MAKE money?
Pssssh- yeeeeah i can totally see them SPENDING money if it took em this long to get money. That and we all know it would be crap anyway.
What do you mean generals 2 could SO easily be woke.
The "online" version got pulled too and Victory Games (devs) were shut down by corporate (EA Games) putting the matter to rest.
Ah yes..the fictional story (even though so very close to reality) was set in the year..2023.
Guess they had "vision" that it would hit too close to reality, which in many ways, did.
Have a nice day!
Not just Generals,but the whole Command and Conquer franchise is dead,untill some indies RTS game make a RTS genre mainstream in gen z like Fortnite or Palworld
You are right.
No.
It sure would of been a nice game...