ai generated content.

[Leksei]

This is clearly an ai generated faces. And maybe more, judging by the awkward drawing & placing of hands.

[Akira]

buy a glasses.

[Bandt30]

Originally posted by Leksei:

This is clearly an ai generated faces. And maybe more, judging by the awkward drawing & placing of hands.

It's definitely AI generated. Not the animations, or the code, or the writing, but the characters are. I used stable diffusion before, and the art style is unmistakably the same as one of the image generation models I used. Same flaws too.

Steam REALLY needs to crack down on this and force devs to disclose whether AI generated content is in the game.

[St. Haborym]

Originally posted by Akira:

buy a glasses.

Sounds like you're the one who needs to buy glasses, cause you're the only here who didn't notice it. The fact that it's dirt cheap is also kind of a dead giveaway.

[Necroel]

Originally posted by Leksei:

This is clearly an ai generated faces. And maybe more, judging by the awkward drawing & placing of hands.

Originally posted by St. Haborym:

Originally posted by Akira:

buy a glasses.

Sounds like you're the one who needs to buy glasses, cause you're the only here who didn't notice it. The fact that it's dirt cheap is also kind of a dead giveaway.

Originally posted by Bandt30:

Originally posted by Leksei:

This is clearly an ai generated faces. And maybe more, judging by the awkward drawing & placing of hands.

It's definitely AI generated. Not the animations, or the code, or the writing, but the characters are. I used stable diffusion before, and the art style is unmistakably the same as one of the image generation models I used. Same flaws too.

Steam REALLY needs to crack down on this and force devs to disclose whether AI generated content is in the game.

Is someone forcing you to buy? If you don't like it, just leave.

The game description says that it uses generated A.I. content:
"All the sex scenes of this game have been made using handmade drafts of poses (ControlNet) and reworked by a porn-artist. All the dataset used for training was created using his own art (for a consistent style). All animations were handmade after this process."

I don’t care who will make the game, a real person or A.I. if I like the game.

[Leksei]

Originally posted by Necroel:

Is someone forcing you to buy? If you don't like it, just leave.

Great arguments. Does it apply to any sort of content that is forbidden on a platform? Or everything should just pour in, and those who doesn't want to buy, just shouldn't?

Originally posted by Necroel:

The game description says that it uses generated A.I. content:
"All the sex scenes of this game have been made using handmade drafts of poses (ControlNet) and reworked by a porn-artist.

I,d personally believe it whey i see at least some process pictures.

And it wasn't saying this when i posted this. But this is rather dubious claim by itself. Since the pose looks a lot like what you get by promting.
With all the hidden hands (the results negative promts about hands).

Originally posted by Necroel:

All the dataset used for training was created using his own art (for a consistent style).

If this were the case it wouldn't be so generic & obvious to be an "AI" generation. And wouldn't even required to any mentions of "ai" at all.
It is likely a "fine tuned" model.
If i have the time, i'll check out what is the exact name of particular model that does this types of faces the best.

Originally posted by Necroel:

I don’t care who will make the game, a real person or A.I. if I like the game.

I am sure you are, and there are lot of people like you out there.
Who thinks there shouldn't be any ethical restrictions or censorship on media, or copyright protections for that matter, despite leaving all their live with a rather robust set of ethical restriction & censorship.

[RhondoDio]

Hey, if the AI was trained on a pose database and the artist that then retouched the images, that's about as ethical as AI art can be bro. It even looks significantly less disturbing than most, and significantly more consistent, so I'm inclined to believe it. If the artist decided they wanted to use it this way, whatever, it's their art they trained it on so they have all the say in its use.

[Leksei]

Originally posted by RhondoDio:

Hey, if the AI was trained on a pose database and the artist that then retouched the images, that's about as ethical as AI art can be bro. It even looks significantly less disturbing than most, and significantly more consistent, so I'm inclined to believe it. If the artist decided they wanted to use it this way, whatever, it's their art they trained it on so they have all the say in its use.

Originally posted by RhondoDio:

Hey, if the AI was trained on a pose database

What is a pose database? Where do this image for "poses database" come from? Are the sourced more ethically than other datasets? Are you one of those people making claims that poses can't be copyrighted? If so, how can you be so sure that it's only poses that's being taken from image and nothing more? What about a loads of copyrighted dance moves like the one used in Fortnight?

Originally posted by RhondoDio:

and the artist that then retouched the images, that's about as ethical as AI art can be bro.

True. It's as much as it can be. But it's still far from enough though. If something more unethical exist out there, doesn't mean the subject at hand becomes more ethical.

Originally posted by RhondoDio:

It even looks significantly less disturbing than most,

It looks like you haven't seen enough ai imagery.

Originally posted by RhondoDio:

and significantly more consistent, so I'm inclined to believe it.

Of course it is consistent. As consistent as custom trained on this types of face models are. You can go to civit ai download any anime model and have a very same and very consistent face.
Have you been to civitai anime category? Like I don't care enought to figure out exact model + lora but it's definetely one of the common ones. Likely the one the nintendo shop are being spammed with.

Originally posted by RhondoDio:

I'm inclined to believe it. If the artist decided they wanted to use it this way, whatever, it's their art they trained it on so they have all the say in its use.

Except there is no mentioning of "training on their own art anywhere" not even examples of "own art" that was used to train. We are like 3 years into this ai bubble thing right?
And no one, Not even large studios like blizzard has claim to have made a successful model trained on their own art data (and the blizzard or EA own a lot more art than any individual). You can look up claims from open AI devs that it's impossible to LLM to work without scraping copyrighted data. You can not produce anything that is viable even with heavy retouching without the use of copyrighted data sets.

[andra.rmw]

holy ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥ this "thread" is college level debate