Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
. ratio =/= ration.
. the higher the better.
How would this translate to the number of gears?
I couldn't find any scientific evidence of which gearbox is the best for fuel consumption.
Well, thanks Einstein, but it was implied that I was asking for numbers :P
I'm currently doing ~7mpg, I don't know how good (or bad) this ratio is.
If you don't mind me asking, which gearbox do you use?
Sure there’s more shifting involved but it’s much easier on the poor cylinders
I did but you didn't understood my answers.
Lower RPM = lower fuel consumption, right ? I mean, right ?
06 speeds @ 65MPH = 1800 RPM
10 speeds @ 65MPH = 1600 RPM
12 speeds @ 65MPH = 1400 RPM
18 speeds @ 65MPH = 1000 RPM
Lower RPM = lower fuel consumption, right ?
With a load of 20 tons @ 65 MPH and a 6-speeds gearbox, you can only use the 6th (@ 1800 RPM)
With a load of 20 tons @ 65 MPH and a 18-speeds gearbox, you can use the 16th, 17th or 18th (between 1000 and 1200 RPM)
Which gearbox is best ?
If I'm Einstein, you're Edison. You're not a daily driver with a fixed load every day of every week, your gas money is not a weekly allowance, you could fill your tank every 30miles, nobody will bat an eye. In short, if an exact number cannot be an answer, " higher is better " is.
Thanks!
And it's "didn't understand", not "didn't understood", "Einstein" ;-)
It depends. RPM by itself is not a deciding factor for fuel consumption, but e.g. throttle*RPM, light or heavy loads, and if you're on a leveled plane (cruising or getting to speed) or doing an uphill battle.
For cruising, the general idea is that lower RPM is better, yes. But it also depends on the engine:
"The 2007 on-highway fuel economy gearing for Linehaul Applications (≤ 80,000 lbs) at 65
mph is 1400 rpm for ISX engines with a minimum of 1650 torque in the top 2 gears and
1500 rpm for all ISM engines."
https://cumminsengines.com/uploads/docs/cummins_secrets_of_better_fuel_economy.pdf
Have you actually verified this in game? Because the gearing ratio on a 6-speed gearbox makes it so that, when it 6th gear, you're able to cruise at 60 mph @1100-1200 RPM as evidenced in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_3ZWd_j7-4
At 2000 RPM he's at 100 mph.
So at cruising speeds I don't think there's a difference. I may chose between a 10 and a 6 speed gearbox. I like H-shifting, but 18 gears seem a little overkill to me.
OK.
It should be obvious that "higher is better", and replying with such in-your-nose comment is not only not helping anyone, it's also a downright waste of time for everybody. It's like if I asked "what is a good amount of money to earn in 7 days of work in ATS" and somebody replied "well herp derp, the more you earn, the better". Yeah, no kidding, "genius" :D How about you give me some numbers now so I can compare with how much I earned, and then we can talk.