Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
At least match the % that ETS2 had from the start.
Why?
Alot of work on rescale to 1:20 from 1:35, cost alot of work their not "getting paid" for doing from the community. And it will take time to make a new new state to ATS, so yeah it proboably going to be paid as alot of work without any real income unless new sales of the game.
ATS's assets are having to be built from scratch. Which means someone has to model/texture everything you see in the game. A new section of map equals more new assets & someone needs to get paid for their work.
SCS is a business & doing things for free will not put food on your table. There has to be money made somewhere or there will be no business to worry about.
After that I could see New Mexico being offered in combination with Texas when it's released, or people who already own New Mexico may be able to get Texas at a discount.
Again, total wild guess. But it's fun to think about.
I for one will gladly pay them for each new state if they keep up with their current quality.