Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
1. Just because SCS have the rights to use the logo does not confer any rights on you to re-use it.
2. Your error's in replicating a company's model does not mean you aren't trying to use their model.
3. SCS is not at fault in any way for modders making money off mods. A modder is free to create a perfectly new truck design and not infringe on anyone's copyright.
When it comes to licenses that the company have, lets use Kenworth as an example for SCS. You do not work for SCS, you have no legal contract with Kenworth allowing you to use the Kenworth name or brand in any of your mods. You are breaking the law by doing so.
Now if that mod is free and using SCS made parts, Kenworth would turn a blind eye in most cases. But you do not have permission to sell a mod with that content in it.
As far as mods using SCS content like a map mod using their prefabs, that I can't answer. I have read SCS's policy on making money from their assets. That it is a company by company legal agreement that you would have to look into.
You have to remember that SCS do not authorise any mods, they and unofficial and unsupported. You need expression permission to sell something you don't own. This isn't a "if it doesn't say no, it's fine." It's very much a "if it doesn't say yes, you're not allowed to" situation. To put it in perspective: Do you have a sign on your door saying "You are not allowed to rob my house at gun point?" No? does that mean I can then? No of course not. Yes I know that's an extreme example, but that is how the law works. If no permission is inferred then there is no permission.
One big fallacy I see thrown around a lot is that if you copy it you own it. You don't. It doesn't matter if it's a 100% copy or not. You are actively attempting to copy it, that is your intention. It does not become creative commons or fair use just because you recreated it.
2. There's no fault on SCS at all. You are an individual who made a choice. SCS didn't put a gun to your head and force you to make mods.
Yes RTA mods are badly made. I have a version of the K200 (not paid for) and I've had the T908, Range T, and Merc MP4. All had major flaws and none of them are optimised.
Recent models? I haven't seen the Merc available on their site so if you are talking about older versions then you are basing your opinion on old models.
Like I sad in the recent "paid mods" thread a few weeks ago: Morally speaking, I don't mind if someone skirts the law when making a mod, SO LONG as they don't expect me to pay them for it. If you didn't cross the "T"s and dot the "I"s, I'm not supporting you financially. Simple as that.
The Merc is a very old model to be sure. It was released before SCS put their official one out. Why they removed it I don't know, probably because the SCS one came, probably stopped being profitable.
The k200 I get the updates when the person who bought it sends me them to unlock. ;)
Promods is free. What you paid for was to download the file from a paid server instead of their free server.