Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Very helpful, thank you for confirming.
Anyway, thank you for your replies!
it's very lazy and easy to make 1 story with dialogue that fits everyone and much harder to make 2 variants with slight differences based on your gender. so yeah, never assume these devs or companies care at all about inclusion and always assume they are cheap and lazy, because that is always the actual answer
a truly "inclusive" game would have 3 options with 3 variants of the story. male, female and neutral. you know what's crazy? you never see that, because it takes effort and costs money, so unless you see 3 options, as I said, it's not for inclusion but for laziness and being cheap.
Because now we have 365 genders and developers MUST include them otherwise they are n*zi, big*ts and other insults that good people like them use.