Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I mean, neither are the FF PRs, though I'm not disagreeing with you entirely here.
I don't think it nessesarily should have been $60 but it is a total remake of the game, with a good deal of new content, as opposed to the PRs which of you exclude the soundtacks all probably had as much work combined as this one game, if not less.
Add to that the fact all of them were on the same engine and were mechanically very similar, with very little in the way of real cutscenes and no VA at all, and you've got a set of games that probably had an absurdly low production cost all things considered.
LOL, this looks WAY better than the Pixel Remasters. Those are more like remasters, this is a remake. Also, games have been $60 for 40 years.
Cheers.
BTW if any of you still have old Nes or Snes cartridges, look up the FC Twin. It plays both and it can also use real snes controllers.
An NES remaster? LOL, it's a remake. They even had a Super Nintendo remake of this game in the 90s. An NES remaster would have to have come out in like 1988 hahaha.
Lol ff3 and 5 pixie remasters looked bad, very bad. They weren't worth 3 dollars.
Do you even know how to read? You aren't even responding to anything I'm saying.