安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
IDK why it's so hard for them to comprehend this, I mentioned this before but going by DQ11 sales, it literally sold 6.5 Million and 5.3 Million of those were from Japan, That's 81.5% which is insane and it seems that Japanese players really hate the changes as well, no way they would've brought this up at TGS if they weren't making a fuss about it over there.
18.5% Is pretty much the rest of the world and I'm almost sure if giving the choice to every single player out there the Majority for sure will choose M/F instead of A/B. Anyways in the future this will change, I truly believe that and it's good.
Why are people so obsessed with someone owning the game before it even is released? Especially when you have a sect of people in the "never pre-order" crew will insult you for daring to so. But beyond that, not everyone buys games at release time -- I usually don't. Sales exist and many of us are patient enough to wait.
Not that it even matters here, considering I did, in fact, buy the game. And yes I'm aware there's no mouse by my name, because GMG doesn't supply keys until the game is out.
But what's funny about it is that anyone bothered to make a petition in the first place. I've been online for probably 28 years and maybe ever seen all of two petetions that actually were succesful. Even back in the late 90s online petitions were a big joke.
Correct, I agree to that if I was honest since you don't know how the game even runs till it's out and seen few benchmarks or trying it out yourself so I'll give you that.
Everything else mentioned in that posts still stands though.
As if it's not a valid point. People will keep using it because it's relevant to the subject, and trying to use shame to silence others is pathetic.
1. 40 dollar hero shooter in a genre over saturated in them
2. 8 years development time
3. Sony can't make games anymore
4. Outdated programming/game mechanics
5. Maps were difficult and not fun at all.
Exactly
Concord is actually a very good and valid point to bring up, I'll add to that a couple of games that I wanted to buy but I literally won't be buying them due to the woke virus
Assassin creed shadows, true shame as I really wanted a proper assassin creed game that takes place in Japan
Fable, just of the MC if I was honest so far
GOW R, Honestly can't believe that I didn't buy it by now and I have the platinum in every single GOW game on PS including top 10 world record in one Ascension
Spiderman games, a shame since I'm a big fan of Spiderman.
You get the point.
Who tells them the changes are needed? And what institutions require the changes?
The last of which is the most puzzling. I mean, I don't think ESRB or CERO would demand the removal of the word male and female. Which brings this into question:
Yeah, and people finding their DEI inspired designs from boring and lame to downright disgusting had nothing to do with it? It's not that people didn't buy it because they thought "It has DEI, so i don't buy", it's more like "This looks hideous" even if they don't know all those terrible decissions came from SJW, Woke, DEI ideoligies, same stuff, different name. You don't need to know the name of the desease to feel sick by it's symptoms.
Now, applying this filth to already stablished worlds, created by actual creative and talented people is way worse.
That's why people won't stay slient and let people like you keep steping over what true artists created decades ago.
And yet, here you are defending ""small"" decissions that make the game a little bit worse in the name of a not so hidden anymore agenda, fighting people who want the game to be as good as possible and a faithful artistic representation of what the original was.
The original and the SNES one are some of the best RPGs ever made. This game is disrespectful to those works, basically implying something was wrong with them that it needed to be changed.
The only people who don't see why these changes are made are willingfully ignorant, haven't been paying atention to the gaming industry nowdays or people who actually want to push these changes. I don't know in what field you fall, but it's just as damaging to the artistic integrity of the game.
Even Yuji Horii came out against this unnecessary alterations, so there's that on top. Tetsuya Nomura talked about this too, and Square Enix is bleeding money to push west ideology focused games like Forspoken.
If Square don't repect the original work, they don't deserve to profit from the fans that loved it.
The fanbase is not complaining to destroy the game, they're actually trying to save it or at the very least avoid these mistakes to be commited again in the future.