Too expensive for 2d game no?

[iXeN]

Especially being the same game, in my opinion it should have been around $30
If it was a remake like FF7, yes it would worth $60.
Hopefully they will revise its regional price.

[Call Sign: Raven]

Well, and in terms of content it is very over priced. Stardew Valley has 20x the content and it is usually around $15.

[iXeN]

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Well, and in terms of content it is very over priced. Stardew Valley has 20x the content and it is usually around $15.

That's what I meant, like yeah I agree it's a great JRPG but same game with its 3rd release for full price...

[Call Sign: Raven]

Originally posted by iXeN:

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Well, and in terms of content it is very over priced. Stardew Valley has 20x the content and it is usually around $15.

That's what I meant, like yeah I agree it's a great JRPG but same game with its 3rd release for full price...

Definitely a hard sale.

[Sage Pirotess]

You guys are funny. 2dhd is costly to make, and to many ot will be first timd playing dq3.

As for 60 bucks. Technically gmg had it 20% off. But furthermore... metaphor refantazio 60, trash game. Combat basically non existent. Sword art online fractured daydream. 60 bucks for a game that should been f2p gatcha.

The game will do fine. It also is part of a trilogy releasing next year.

[iXeN]

If trilogy for $60 it's fine, buy each one costing $60 is not SE lawyer.

[Casual Hero]

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Well, and in terms of content it is very over priced. Stardew Valley has 20x the content and it is usually around $15.

We've been conditioned to believe that more content = more money.

That'd how we get things like Ubisoft bloatware collectathons.

[Call Sign: Raven]

Originally posted by Sage Pirotess:

You guys are funny. 2dhd is costly to make, and to many ot will be first timd playing dq3.

As for 60 bucks. Technically gmg had it 20% off. But furthermore... metaphor refantazio 60, trash game. Combat basically non existent. Sword art online fractured daydream. 60 bucks for a game that should been f2p gatcha.

The game will do fine. It also is part of a trilogy releasing next year.

How much did it cost to make?

[iXeN]

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Originally posted by Sage Pirotess:

You guys are funny. 2dhd is costly to make, and to many ot will be first timd playing dq3.

As for 60 bucks. Technically gmg had it 20% off. But furthermore... metaphor refantazio 60, trash game. Combat basically non existent. Sword art online fractured daydream. 60 bucks for a game that should been f2p gatcha.

The game will do fine. It also is part of a trilogy releasing next year.

How much did it cost to make?

It costed 60$ xD

[Vent]

The game literally has no Regional Pricing in Southeast Asia and they're selling it for full Burger Price. Woke crap + 60 usd + Denuvo LMAO.

[theclaw135]

Originally posted by Casual Hero:

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Well, and in terms of content it is very over priced. Stardew Valley has 20x the content and it is usually around $15.

We've been conditioned to believe that more content = more money.

That'd how we get things like Ubisoft bloatware collectathons.

I'm inclined to agree. Far too many developers waste time implementing meaningless grinding and busywork.

Oh no, taming all 100 monsters for the terribly unbalanced combat isn't enough. Now you can catch 700! ZOMG!

Bored with collecting bananas? Now they're stars, gold rings, wumpa fruit, jigsaw pieces...

[H-Foundry PIXIV]

It looks decent effort to look appealing, if you look at the trailer anyway tbh. Just not $60 decent considering many people know what the game is like too in terms of content and what to expect.

Originally posted by Vent:

The game literally has no Regional Pricing in Southeast Asia and they're selling it for full Burger Price. Woke crap + 60 usd + Denuvo LMAO.

It's a bad sign. I wonder if steam key reseller sites are any better.

[Call Sign: Raven]

Originally posted by Casual Hero:

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Well, and in terms of content it is very over priced. Stardew Valley has 20x the content and it is usually around $15.

We've been conditioned to believe that more content = more money.

That'd how we get things like Ubisoft bloatware collectathons.

Sure, it's easy to pull examples of games that are considered bloatware, but Stardew has more content for LESS money that I would hardly consider bloatware, how does that work?

[Sage Pirotess]

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Originally posted by Casual Hero:

We've been conditioned to believe that more content = more money.

That'd how we get things like Ubisoft bloatware collectathons.

Sure, it's easy to pull examples of games that are considered bloatware, but Stardew has more content for LESS money that I would hardly consider bloatware, how does that work?

Content is not always king. Especially two genres. Farming sim is not a jrpg. And as n rpg is a story. Time management and resource management.

A jrpg like dq3 is a story. Will remember it far more than a farming sim. Besides. Never touched stardew. HARVESTELLA for me.

[Call Sign: Raven]

Originally posted by Sage Pirotess:

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Sure, it's easy to pull examples of games that are considered bloatware, but Stardew has more content for LESS money that I would hardly consider bloatware, how does that work?

Content is not always king. Especially two genres. Farming sim is not a jrpg. And as n rpg is a story. Time management and resource management.

A jrpg like dq3 is a story. Will remember it far more than a farming sim. Besides. Never touched stardew. HARVESTELLA for me.

I disagree. When you see the way games that offer meaningful content flourish, content is quite literally king. Witcher 3, Elden Ring, Skyrim, Oblivion, Morrowind, Stardew Valley, to name a few off the top of my head. This idea that less content is actually a good thing doesn't equate with the general way people receive a game. If what you were saying were objectively true, Dragon Quest would be an astounding success in the west instead of being a shadow of the sales you see in Japan.

And you really SHOULD touch Stardew, at the very least to help you understand the argument. I can immediately think of so many memorable moments I had in that game, but can barely remember the story beats in Dragon Warrior 3, WHICH I GREW UP ON, btw. The memorable moments in the early DQ games are absolutely not for the paper-thin story. Those early games exist as a very basic rpg, and we have (thankfully) come such a long way from them!

[Casual Hero]

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Originally posted by Casual Hero:

We've been conditioned to believe that more content = more money.

That'd how we get things like Ubisoft bloatware collectathons.

Sure, it's easy to pull examples of games that are considered bloatware, but Stardew has more content for LESS money that I would hardly consider bloatware, how does that work?

It was made by a single person, and entirely self-funded.