Cuphead

Cuphead

View Stats:
Seared Bite Dec 22, 2017 @ 2:49pm
The fact that this game doesn't have online multiplayer is unacceptable. . .
Is this game going to get online multiplayer patched in ever? All the circlejerk aside, I feel more than scammed, seeing as how it was definitely advertised as a multiplayer game. Me and my girlfriend 500 miles away paid 40 f*cking dollars for this expecting to be able to play it together over break, now we're stuck playing it alone.

Seriously, more people should be complaining about this.
Last edited by Seared Bite; Dec 22, 2017 @ 2:51pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 67 comments
Troshnak Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:13pm 
Where does it say on the store page that you can play on-line? Learn to read before buying stuff in future you moron.
Albert Heijn Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:16pm 
on the store page it says "singleplayer" and "local coop mode". it is your fault that you feel "scammed" and not the fault of the devs
artw65 Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:19pm 
It wouldn't hurt if they added online multiplayer, but why should more people complain about something that was never promised or even mentioned? I think the fault is all on you for just not looking into it well enough.
Seared Bite Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:19pm 
Originally posted by Goaßmaß :3:
on the store page it says "singleplayer" and "local coop mode". it is your fault that you feel "scammed" and not the fault of the devs
Yet another circlejerk. The fact that a game where co-op is central to the game does not have online multiplayer in 2017 is just bad. Case closed.
Jetpackpenguin Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:21pm 
Originally posted by Based Ajit:
Originally posted by Goaßmaß :3:
on the store page it says "singleplayer" and "local coop mode". it is your fault that you feel "scammed" and not the fault of the devs
Yet another circlejerk. The fact that a game where co-op is central to the game does not have online multiplayer in 2017 is just bad. Case closed.

refund and move on, also learn to read.
Seared Bite Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:24pm 
Originally posted by Jetpackpenguin:
Originally posted by Based Ajit:
Yet another circlejerk. The fact that a game where co-op is central to the game does not have online multiplayer in 2017 is just bad. Case closed.

refund and move on, also learn to read.
Again, since you seem to have trouble understanding my point, the fact that it says on the steam store that the game does not have online multiplayer is irrelevant. Co-op is core to the gameplay, and whether it was promised or said to have been included or not, the fact that online multiplayer is not a feature is absolutely terrible.

Now my question is whether or not they were going to add it in later, which you have not answered.
FurudoErika Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:39pm 
Originally posted by Based Ajit:
Originally posted by Jetpackpenguin:

refund and move on, also learn to read.
Again, since you seem to have trouble understanding my point, the fact that it says on the steam store that the game does not have online multiplayer is irrelevant. Co-op is core to the gameplay, and whether it was promised or said to have been included or not, the fact that online multiplayer is not a feature is absolutely terrible.

Now my question is whether or not they were going to add it in later, which you have not answered.

The only one having issues understanding things is definitely you; you keep speaking about some fact X being the objective truth based on your and your only opinion about that, completely ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people who bought this game do not hold this opinion.

So, basically, the game description states that there is no online co-op, millions of people have bought this game and see no problem with that fact. So, in short, there is absolutely nothing wrong about there being no online co-op. You having some issues with that is irrelevant - you can try going the Zoe Quinn route and start living in some alternative reality, but it won't change the actual reality. You aren't entitled to getting things the way you want them, it all comes down to that awesome fact (or sad, if you're one of those people who get triggered when business owners don't bake the cake for them) in the end. Case closed.
TarMan Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:52pm 
So you didn't read the games description before buying it and this is somehow someone elses fault but your own?

It must be nice living in a world where everything is always someone elses fault.
Honestly this is just ridiculous. I spent 16 whole dollars on this game, played 3 hours because I thought my son would be able to play it with me from college once he got on, and then we both found out that it doesn't work. The developers don't just owe me 20 dollars, which I will demand back from them. They owe me compensation for the wasted time. This game is literally so difficult you HAVE to have someone else to play it with you, otherwise it is completely unbeatable.
Seared Bite Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:59pm 
Originally posted by FurudoErika:
Originally posted by Based Ajit:
Again, since you seem to have trouble understanding my point, the fact that it says on the steam store that the game does not have online multiplayer is irrelevant. Co-op is core to the gameplay, and whether it was promised or said to have been included or not, the fact that online multiplayer is not a feature is absolutely terrible.

Now my question is whether or not they were going to add it in later, which you have not answered.

The only one having issues understanding things is definitely you; you keep speaking about some fact X being the objective truth based on your and your only opinion about that, completely ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people who bought this game do not hold this opinion.

So, basically, the game description states that there is no online co-op, millions of people have bought this game and see no problem with that fact. So, in short, there is absolutely nothing wrong about there being no online co-op. You having some issues with that is irrelevant - you can try going the Zoe Quinn route and start living in some alternative reality, but it won't change the actual reality. You aren't entitled to getting things the way you want them, it all comes down to that awesome fact (or sad, if you're one of those people who get triggered when business owners don't bake the cake for them) in the end. Case closed.
Oh man I totally agree. It's 100% good design when a steam game with multiplayer lacks online multiplayer. The fact that so many people bought this game and everyone raves about it means that it isn't *at all* a problem. Actually, the popularity completely negates any reason to complain about anything "bad" in this game. In fact I think every game nowadays should not even have online multiplayer or local multiplayer modes at all. Yeah, f*ck that hand-holding sh*t. Instead, devs should just force players to mod in their own multiplayer designs and create their own servers on logmeinhamachi. Now *that's* good game design.
Last edited by Seared Bite; Dec 22, 2017 @ 3:59pm
aG| Wardog Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:05pm 
It's 2017 so it should have online multiplayer? That's your logic?

That's silly. It was made by a very small team who probably couldn't afford to run servers for the game, or might not have thought of it.

If you'd just read the store page properly, you would've known that it doesn't have online multiplayer, and wouldn't have any reason to complain.
Seared Bite Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:10pm 
Originally posted by Wardog:
It's 2017 so it should have online multiplayer? That's your logic?

That's silly. It was made by a very small team who probably couldn't afford to run servers for the game, or might not have thought of it.

If you'd just read the store page properly, you would've known that it doesn't have online multiplayer, and wouldn't have any reason to complain.
Yeah I feel very bad for that team of multimillionaires who can't afford to add online multiplayer to their game several months after release.
aG| Wardog Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:14pm 
Originally posted by KyloRenKillsSnokeAndLukeDies:
Originally posted by Wardog:
It's 2017 so it should have online multiplayer? That's your logic?

That's silly. It was made by a very small team who probably couldn't afford to run servers for the game, or might not have thought of it.

If you'd just read the store page properly, you would've known that it doesn't have online multiplayer, and wouldn't have any reason to complain.
Yeah I feel very bad for that team of multimillionaires who can't afford to add online multiplayer to their game several months after release.
Do some research. Development was started by just two guys, who are brothers, and grew from there.

It's still a small indie team, not some huge AAA developer.

Your argument is still completely ridiculous. Just because it's 2017, doesn't mean that everything needs to have online multiplayer.

The remaster of Skyrim doesn't have it, would you say that's stupid?
terr0rble Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:16pm 
Cuphead is advertised as local co-op. Please pay attention next time.
Seared Bite Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:16pm 
Originally posted by Wardog:
Originally posted by KyloRenKillsSnokeAndLukeDies:
Yeah I feel very bad for that team of multimillionaires who can't afford to add online multiplayer to their game several months after release.
Do some research. Development was started by just two guys, who are brothers, and grew from there.

It's still a small indie team, not some huge AAA developer.

Your argument is still completely ridiculous. Just because it's 2017, doesn't mean that everything needs to have online multiplayer.

The remaster of Skyrim doesn't have it, would you say that's stupid?
Poor guys, they must have had it rough back in September. Must be nice having several million now, but man they clearly don't have enough to add in online multiplayer do they?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 67 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Dec 22, 2017 @ 2:49pm
Posts: 67