Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With a 6 way connector you can attach 4 ammo clips to the autoloader for a fast reload. while only losing 1 input feeder.
its nothing about testing the lams.
the 6 way connectors are usually obsolete and only take up space, except when you have a railgun, then you want a few to connect the rail gun chargers to it
WHAT DO?
the 4 Q switch will outperform the other setup greatly. I dont know at which point that a non Q switch system will do better, i simply never built a laser that big yet. And i normally struggle with power needed to run everything.
how do they outperform???
So while a 0-Q-switch LAMS will do around 13 damage/sec on a small engine -way too low to destroy any missiles, that same system will to around 130 damage/pulse with a Q-switch setup, enabling it to have a chance to down missiles.
Could it be something like above 2500 parts 3 Q switches 5000 2 Q switches 7500 1 Q.....
Might build one, but then again more factors like amount of LAMS and Laser weapons kick in since they will affect the damage output.
Guess the answer is test and tweak and repeat. And keep an eye on the multipurpose laser while it counters and fires to ensure it is not dropping in damage as it fires.
I think there used to be a dps increase for lams without q switches... and their might still be one, I only really use q switches for offensive lasers since that leads to higher penetration per shot and less laser sensor procs which makes smoke less effective.
was wondering the same thing and did some testing. I know im 5 years late.
with 0Q you get a 0.25 penalty to dmg/energy (making it 75%) whereas 1-4Q have 100%. you are right as 0Q doesn't waste any power however has the debuff of 25%. and only has the perk of extra 20 ap which is unimportant in lams. that is why Q's are used.
Then why is 4Q used not 1-3? cuz efficiency and accuracy. efficient because extra energy is not overkilling targets and by extension more targets can be hit. Rate of fire for q1-4 respectively is 1, 2, 4, 8 per second so if you are getting overwhelmed then 1, 2, or 4 are not enough to keep up with demand. accuracy is that 0Q never miss as they shoot 40 times/s. by the same logic the highest rate of fire q switch is the 4Q so it is as close to 0Q without getting the debuff.
Hope you are still playing the game.
Good luck.