Which classes should I pick?

[9S]

Should I do Wizard/Battle Bow, Sorcerer/Battle Bow, or Wizard/Sorcerer? Please help me, I'd love to hear from everyone. Thanks! :D

[>~Wankelmut~7]

Wait for Shuriken and Level to 60 any class you want meanwhile and get used to the game and its mechanic.Because leveling something now shortly before Shuriken(even it takes 1-3 months) is not a good idea simply shuriken is the best to play.

[>~Wankelmut~7]

But i can tell you Sorcerer/Bard or Wizard/Bard is really funny
Sorcerer/Wizard or Wizard/Sorcerer is also good but sorcerer is way better than wizard overall.

[9S]

Originally posted by darksophie1992:

But i can tell you Sorcerer/Bard or Wizard/Bard is really funny
Sorcerer/Wizard or Wizard/Sorcerer is also good but sorcerer is way better than wizard overall.

Okay, thanks! I was kind of leaning on Sorcerer/Battle Bow more! I'll take your advice, thanks! Also, which is better, Sorcerer/Battle Bow or Sorcerer/Bard?

[Ocarinyx]

I think you should a Wizard/Sorcerer since I personally thought it was cool. I have a level 65 Wizrd/Sorc and it's pretty fun to use.

[Niariekyil Arcyriea]

I'm beginning with the bow so I could able to understand the game in the earlier stages~ Kisa is my first~

Or maybe a bard so you can heal and survive with no need of potions,, thus main bard is able to do much more like group heal ballad capability.

[9S]

Can a sorcerer use healing spells or something or? Lol I'm such a noob.

[Doehardt]

Originally posted by darksophie1992:

Wait for Shuriken and Level to 60 any class you want meanwhile and get used to the game and its mechanic.Because leveling something now shortly before Shuriken(even it takes 1-3 months) is not a good idea simply shuriken is the best to play.

This is the definition of cancer.

I do not recommend going all out on Shuriken. You will get bored in no time and will burn yourself out badly from the game. It is simply boring as hell.

There are various other alternatives such as Crusader, Ravager, Wizard, Gunslinger, Sorcerer and Ronin. But I don't expect a lot from an OS player anyways.

On-topic:

Wizard-Sorcerer is the most solid, Wizard-Warbow is a nice idea if you want SPD and a nice double-hit proc.

[9S]

Originally posted by Sgt Doe Crits:

Originally posted by darksophie1992:

Wait for Shuriken and Level to 60 any class you want meanwhile and get used to the game and its mechanic.Because leveling something now shortly before Shuriken(even it takes 1-3 months) is not a good idea simply shuriken is the best to play.

This is the definition of cancer.

I do not recommend going all out on Shuriken. You will get bored in no time and will burn yourself out badly from the game. It is simply boring as hell.

There are various other alternatives such as Crusader, Ravager, Wizard, Gunslinger, Sorcerer and Ronin. But I don't expect a lot from an OS player anyways.

On-topic:

Wizard-Sorcerer is the most solid, Wizard-Warbow is a nice idea if you want SPD and a nice double-hit proc.

What would be the most powerful with a sorcerer tho?

[Doehardt]

Originally posted by GLAcraft101:

Originally posted by Sgt Doe Crits:

This is the definition of cancer.

I do not recommend going all out on Shuriken. You will get bored in no time and will burn yourself out badly from the game. It is simply boring as hell.

There are various other alternatives such as Crusader, Ravager, Wizard, Gunslinger, Sorcerer and Ronin. But I don't expect a lot from an OS player anyways.

On-topic:

Wizard-Sorcerer is the most solid, Wizard-Warbow is a nice idea if you want SPD and a nice double-hit proc.

What would be the most powerful with a sorcerer tho?

Sorcerer-Crusader if you aim for pure DMG, Sorcerer-Bard if you tend to be more supportive.

[9S]

Originally posted by Sgt Doe Crits:

Originally posted by GLAcraft101:

What would be the most powerful with a sorcerer tho?

Sorcerer-Crusader if you aim for pure DMG, Sorcerer-Bard if you tend to be more supportive.

Is Sorcerer/Wizard better for damage or support? What would Sorcerer/Battle Bow be good for?

[Doehardt]

Originally posted by GLAcraft101:

Originally posted by Sgt Doe Crits:

Sorcerer-Crusader if you aim for pure DMG, Sorcerer-Bard if you tend to be more supportive.

Is Sorcerer/Wizard better for damage or support? What would Sorcerer/Battle Bow be good for?

Sorcerer-Wizard

Sorcerer-Wizard excells in crowd controlling and only minorly supports damage. The reason behind this is that a primary Wizard has access to 400% CRIT DMG total compared to a Sorcerer who lives with 300% like almost everyone else. Wizard skills rely on high CRIT DMG to be very strong, so all you get from Wizard as a sub class is crowd controlling:
Fireball + Mastery allow to knockback
Icestrom freezes a group of mobs
Instant Thunder is a group stun
Icy Course is a slowdown

Storm Course can be equipped with a DEF-reduction, but it is not worth it for sorcerers in my opinion. Additionally, you can utilize combo-skills as a Sorcerer-Wizard, but it can be doubted that you need them since the primary reason to have them is invincibility for a moment (between 1-2.8s depending on the ultimate skill)

Sorcerer-Warbow

Sorcerer-Warbow can be considered an exotic variant of Sorcerer. Your benefits are a double-hit buff, a DEF-reducing arrow (flat instead of %), another freeze (single-target) and another DMG-over-time skill. The main jist is the Def-reduction and the double-hit buff, but I personally dont recommend it as a Sorcerer since you have your own skills to maintain already. A sub that acts more like a toolbox or a damage hammer is more recommended.

Warbow adds better on Ravager or Crusader for example - two classes that have no great maintenance of status effects on their own so they can keep track of Corrossive Shot (DEF-redux) for example.

[9S]

Originally posted by Sgt Doe Crits:

Originally posted by GLAcraft101:

Is Sorcerer/Wizard better for damage or support? What would Sorcerer/Battle Bow be good for?

Sorcerer-Wizard

Sorcerer-Wizard excells in crowd controlling and only minorly supports damage. The reason behind this is that a primary Wizard has access to 400% CRIT DMG total compared to a Sorcerer who lives with 300% like almost everyone else. Wizard skills rely on high CRIT DMG to be very strong, so all you get from Wizard as a sub class is crowd controlling:
Fireball + Mastery allow to knockback
Icestrom freezes a group of mobs
Instant Thunder is a group stun
Icy Course is a slowdown

Storm Course can be equipped with a DEF-reduction, but it is not worth it for sorcerers in my opinion. Additionally, you can utilize combo-skills as a Sorcerer-Wizard, but it can be doubted that you need them since the primary reason to have them is invincibility for a moment (between 1-2.8s depending on the ultimate skill)

Sorcerer-Warbow

Sorcerer-Warbow can be considered an exotic variant of Sorcerer. Your benefits are a double-hit buff, a DEF-reducing arrow (flat instead of %), another freeze (single-target) and another DMG-over-time skill. The main jist is the Def-reduction and the double-hit buff, but I personally dont recommend it as a Sorcerer since you have your own skills to maintain already. A sub that acts more like a toolbox or a damage hammer is more recommended.

Warbow adds better on Ravager or Crusader for example - two classes that have no great maintenance of status effects on their own so they can keep track of Corrossive Shot (DEF-redux) for example.

Thank you very much for the support, I think I might go for Sorcerer/Bard!