Panzer Corps

Panzer Corps

View Stats:
Doggy Jan 21, 2015 @ 11:36pm
Only 1 vs 1 ?
For tactcal games it will be better to have teammatches like 2vs2 or 3vs3 ,but only 1 vs 1 is boring. It makes much more fun to play in a team.

Will it ever possible to become multiplayergames higher then 1vs1 (patches ect.) ?

1vs1 is like stoneage,most games (civilization,Pandors, age of wonders and many others) support multiplayer higher then only 1vs1.
In such modern time it´s a nogo to have only 1vs1. Panzer Corps is a very great game,but teammatches is a musthave for me when playing online!
Last edited by Doggy; Jan 21, 2015 @ 11:39pm
< >
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
Ares Jan 22, 2015 @ 12:15am 
One nation against one nation should be one vs one.

I don't see the point dividing up half of your army on small maps where your ally will be more a nuisance than a blessing. And the fact you could take full responsibility for the actions you make instead of blaming another.
We played Panzer General in the past even in hotseat till a mod came out where we could play the entire campaign against eachother (and yes, we had plenty of time during the opponent's move but I won't call that boring at all)

In Civ people can play with more than one each representing a nation if I'm correct. The only time I played with teammates in the same army were board games. But the front and the map were so large, a move couldn't be done in one evening if you'd have played alone.
Doggy Jan 22, 2015 @ 12:25am 
1 nation can be managed with some players,thats not the problem. But onlinegames makes much more fun with teamgames. 1nation against another 1 nation is not an argument to have only a 2 player game in multiplayer. We live not in "stoneage,so it must be a possible option to have teamgames in multiplayer.

So you can chat with you teammate about tactics,you dont must click so much because a big army must not only managed from 1 person.

And a similar game like hearts of iron support more then 2 player too.

In this modern age it´s no argument to have only a 1vs1 multiplayer for an online-strategic game.
esgibtkeinbier Jan 22, 2015 @ 2:14am 
You're calling Hearts of Iron a similar game... Right... *shrugs*
[STW] cavour Jan 22, 2015 @ 4:29am 
Why do you want to ruin this game?
Panzer Corps was born to be a wonderful single player, as in sweet old style.
This game's okay, maybe do you wanted another War Thunder?
Doggy Jan 22, 2015 @ 4:57am 
No,but Panzer Corps is a great game with many different tactis.But it will be much better when you have a teammate with you can coordinate different tacticAnd with a bid army you don´t must click so much because your teammate have some work too.
I think the gameplay will be much more better.Every tactic game makes much more fun to play in a team.
But o.k.,i will not the play game,for me it´s most important to to play multiplayer with teammates.
Twelvefield Jan 22, 2015 @ 11:42am 
The biggest problem with multiplayer is other players. If you have a cohesive group of friends, then that kind of multiplayer rocks. If you are an antisocial opinionated old fart elder statesman such as myself, adding more players would be like eating broken glass, especially if it was wrapped in tinfoil first.

Panzer General is just a short step away from tabletop wargaming. Many of those are just 1 v 1 games, but there are some notable games with teams, the super-bloated Warhammer universe coming to mind first. But even elegant, streamlined wargames like Command & Colours you can play on teams.

I'm not against the idea of Panzer General team play, but I personally would never play it. I also think that the early maps are too constricted for team play, which means that to play the ealry war you'd need new maps. That's not an insurmountable difficulty, though.
Last edited by Twelvefield; Jan 22, 2015 @ 11:43am
[STW] cavour Jan 23, 2015 @ 4:14am 
Yeah! Totally agree.
Ares Jan 23, 2015 @ 4:59am 
Originally posted by Doggy:
Panzer Corps is a very great game,but teammatches is a musthave for me when playing online!
Hey wait a minute?!
You don't even own the game... What is your purpose?
That's why you compare this game with Hearts of Iron, he didn't even played this game a second...
Doggy Jan 23, 2015 @ 5:50am 
Yes Hearts of Iron is very different i know!!! But iz´s a not such a stupid mainstreamgame where you only must a fast clickfinger.
I only search for a good strategic game where you must use your brain and Panzer Corps is great.
But for me it´s most important to have teammatches.I don´t like only to play alone,foe me it makes more fun to have a teammate,
For example you have 30 units so you must click a lot to move them all. With a teammate you have only 15 units and dn´t must click so much.And you can chat about next tactic with him.

Ok,let´s stop this here and have a lot of fun with Panzer Corps.But i will have a teammate to play in a team.
I hope a game like Panzer Corps will be released in future but wit a good multiplayer and for 2vs2 ore more.
< >
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 21, 2015 @ 11:36pm
Posts: 9