Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://youtu.be/voLCxkm2puk
Also, a 100+MB is hardly a lot these days.
Also I don't care how little it is, even though I don't believe it takes such little space as if you look at what it actually does, there is absolutely no way it is taking up 100+MB.
https://connorjaydunn.github.io/blog/posts/denuvo-analysis/
And as I've said, the biggest concern isn't even the hard drive space, performance, or hard drive fragmentation. It's the fact that if Denuvo goes under and developers don't patch it out, then that game you bought can't be played anymore.
It has happened with other anti piracy DRM's. And has it actually stopped piracy? Or did just stop people from playing certain games they bought with their money?
Small things, but very annoying.
Maybe proportionately? But so do our storage sizes.
Didn't argue this one as it is a fair concern, though overblown imo. I've been gaming since the C64 days and while you can point to a few rare cases probably most people will never run into it, or more likely, even care by that point. There's also the trend of Denuvo getting removed somewhere down the line anyway (not in the least because of the sub cost most likely). Sega seems to be on a legacy deal but I doubt any new parties will be on a similar plan.
Imo, ideally for any game DRM would get removed ~1 year after active development, like a final act before it goes to maintenance.
They've acknowledged this one and are trying to solve it, though so far without luck I imagine (was somewhere end of last year they mentioned it). Annoying for sure, though avoidable if you're aware it can happen. Still, shouldn't be happening.
And I'm sorry, but nothing is overblown when basically your purchase can become nothing simply because a company that most people don't like can just go out of business one day.
Again, this has happened before.
But if you think that would be too far off to worry about, then there is still the online check.
It’s not about having the means to unlock it, it’s about why you have to ask at all when it’s already yours, why does someone else still get to decide if you can use it?
You seem to be confused. What I responded to was the following:
I'm arguing the bad points you brought up. That doesn't mean there aren't valid points to be discussed surrounding DRM, nor that I disagree with those.
If Denuvo disappears it takes one upload of the uncracked exe for any dev to fix it. The risk doesn't happen till both developer and Denuvo disappear.
They're happening because they know people pirate games. There's no assumption needed there, it happens.
No the risk happens if Denuvo shuts down. As there will be some that don't care to fix as they have made their money already.
Not to the degree that everyone else gets essentially an objectively worse experience because of it. If anything Denuvo getting possibly cracked one day is also more of a risk for piracy then if they didn't have Denuvo at all. The people that pirate a game because they want it for free are unlikely going to buy it if they can't pirate it. And the people that would, I bet you can count on one hand.
The amount of people that don't like Denuvo, are more then likely far bigger, maybe even more then people that pirate games.