Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There is no reason for this game to run this poorly when it's meant to run on a PS4.
Personally I'm happy with the performance, but I do understand that not everyone has my hardware and the system requirements aren't listed as being particular high either.
Only one small problem: 7800x3d peaks at 10% usage and the rtx 3080 at 62% (200% scaling at 1440p) or 40% (100% scaling at 1440p).
Vram is NOT an issue at 200%, poor hardware utilization is!
This game at 100% scaling runs WORSE than Cyberpunk cranked to the max...
Your "optimization" ideas are just nonsensical, as there is something FUNDAMENTALLY wrong with this demo!
For us with crazy stuttering issues with over .1s stalls and if it at the same time max one core change the Affinity of the process, you can just set it to one core and then change it again to all cores and it fix itself for some damn reason and the stuttering issue should be gone, for me i go from 40-50 fps with 0.1 stalls every second to 60-70s and no stalls.
Worth to point out i got a 7800X3D so no they don't power past the issue, and with a RTX 3070 playing at 4k 100% render scale.
And no the game utilize more then two cores, around 6 is where i see no more performance gain myself.
They're suggestions based upon observation, I'm not claiming the demo is optimised or well made. I'm simply trying to help people get better performance, and went so far as to offer suggestions so people could view exactly where their particular problems were.
You never actually stated how much vram was being used by your GPU. GPU usage is not the same as VRAM usage, one is core the other is memory related. Monitor your actual VRAM usage, I believe the 3080 has 10gb? It is possible for a GPU to have the grunt to run a product but not the VRAM.
The demo might be flawed, but I'm not personally having a bad time with it. Feel free to offer constructive input for people, that's all this thread was intended to be for.
Granted I am using DLSS Quality along with Frame Generation but even when turning those off I'd be sitting at 75~85 FPS in those larger areas and I KNOW FFXVI is much more demanding than Metaphor so you'd think Metaphor would be run just as good but no, somehow it's worse.
Also, Metaphor's graphical settings are so bare-bones as well.
I'm monitoring via MSI Afterburner/Riva OSD and it's only showing 2 cores being utilised outside of general O/S crap.
The demo might be fundamentally broken on some level, I have no clue if that's true or not. As mentioned above, I'm not writing some guide to salvation, simply offering my impressions and suggesting tools people can use for a potentially better experience.
Hopefully Atlus resolve the problems others are having come the launch.
Already linked the calc I lazily used mate:
https://www.omnicalculator.com/other/resolution-scale
Feel free to send them a harshly worded email.
The most obvious way to test this is seeing the performance in games. For example, I get more fps in Red Dead 2 if I'm playing at 1440p with 1.0 resolution then if I'm playing at 1080p with 1.5 resolution. Why? Because 1080p at 1.5 is 1620p, thus its more demanding.
Open the schools omg
Buddy, this try hard nonsense is derailing my thread so I'm going to take the easy way out and just block you.
I actually added the above suggestion to my initial post and sourced you, hope you don't mind!