Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
RDR1 is not much like RDR2 in terms of gameplay. If the problem of RDR2 was how slow it felt for you, then you'll likely like how RDR1 feels instead.
Too many come to RDR2 trying to play it like GTA plays. Fast and action packed.
RDR2 isn't meant to be played that way, just going by design. More like a cinematic experience with gameplay too. I loved it, personally. Loved them both, thoroughly
RDR1 is meant to be more of a video game than a cinematic experience with gameplay.
i enjoyed Vice City. I have not played RDR2 much. Just 2 hrs into the game 3-4 times.
You have to get past the starting area for the game to open up and you start having real fun. The beginning in the snowy area is on rails for the most part and it can be a bit tedious to get through.
Well said Sir, so I'm not the only one who got that impression