Story is absurd

[King Bradley]

I am in Mexico, and I am helping both sides at the moment, rebels and government, and both sides know that I am helping the other side, yet they don't mind? Lol

Aside from that it is good, but yeah that's a big con imo.

[turdsmcpoop]

The whole story is kind of corny. But just keep going, your actions will catch up with you.

[King Bradley]

Originally posted by turdsmcpoop:

The whole story is kind of corny. But just keep going, your actions will catch up with you.

Well, I did spoil myself with the ending, before playing RDR2 I watched summary of this game, cause I never thought it would come for PC. But I only know the ending, rest I forgot, so I am enjoying the game.

I like that you can actually die compared to RDR2 where you can take many bullets without problems.

[Geresman]

They DO mind.. 😅​just wait.

[King Bradley]

Originally posted by Geresman:

They DO mind.. 😅​just wait.

Will do, tnx!

[turdsmcpoop]

Originally posted by King Bradley:

Originally posted by turdsmcpoop:

The whole story is kind of corny. But just keep going, your actions will catch up with you.

Well, I did spoil myself with the ending, before playing RDR2 I watched summary of this game, cause I never thought it would come for PC. But I only know the ending, rest I forgot, so I am enjoying the game.

I like that you can actually die compared to RDR2 where you can take many bullets without problems.

That's kind of sad to hear. I haven't played the second one yet, but it already feels like Marsten is a bulletproof superhero. Is 2 dumbed down a lot compared to 1?

Kind of off-topic, but I'm interested to hear.

[King Bradley]

Originally posted by turdsmcpoop:

Originally posted by King Bradley:

Well, I did spoil myself with the ending, before playing RDR2 I watched summary of this game, cause I never thought it would come for PC. But I only know the ending, rest I forgot, so I am enjoying the game.

I like that you can actually die compared to RDR2 where you can take many bullets without problems.

That's kind of sad to hear. I haven't played the second one yet, but it already feels like Marsten is a bulletproof superhero. Is 2 dumbed down a lot compared to 1?

Kind of off-topic, but I'm interested to hear.

Red Dead Redemption 2 is a much better game. It has possibly my favorite story in gaming, everything is much better, except that it's an easier game compared to hardcore. I try to not use dead-eye.

Honestly RDR2 is almost a masterpiece imo, my top 4 games of all time, I only don't like that it's so easy, but it's way different theme compared to RDR, so it's not a big issue. You are not alone, you have a whole gang.

It's way bigger game with slow pace, so it really depends if you like it or not. You can't know until you try and give it a try. But if you are not patient and expect stuff to happen fast, well it won't.

A bit self promotion, but if you go to my profile, you can read my review where I explained it in way more details.

[шАлТаЙ БоЛтАй]

egasg

[KHR3b]

That's typical c r a p houser writing which was NEVER that great, like some rockstar fanboys like to pretend.

[turdsmcpoop]

Originally posted by King Bradley:

Originally posted by turdsmcpoop:

That's kind of sad to hear. I haven't played the second one yet, but it already feels like Marsten is a bulletproof superhero. Is 2 dumbed down a lot compared to 1?

Kind of off-topic, but I'm interested to hear.

Red Dead Redemption 2 is a much better game. It has possibly my favorite story in gaming, everything is much better, except that it's an easier game compared to hardcore. I try to not use dead-eye.

Honestly RDR2 is almost a masterpiece imo, my top 4 games of all time, I only don't like that it's so easy, but it's way different theme compared to RDR, so it's not a big issue. You are not alone, you have a whole gang.

It's way bigger game with slow pace, so it really depends if you like it or not. You can't know until you try and give it a try. But if you are not patient and expect stuff to happen fast, well it won't.

A bit self promotion, but if you go to my profile, you can read my review where I explained it in way more details.

Good to hear. I already bought it so i was going to play it anyway.
I spent 127 hours in my RDR playthrough, so if RDR 2 is a slower pace, I'll probably hit 300. That's a lot of poker.

[King Bradley]

Originally posted by turdsmcpoop:

Originally posted by King Bradley:

Red Dead Redemption 2 is a much better game. It has possibly my favorite story in gaming, everything is much better, except that it's an easier game compared to hardcore. I try to not use dead-eye.

Honestly RDR2 is almost a masterpiece imo, my top 4 games of all time, I only don't like that it's so easy, but it's way different theme compared to RDR, so it's not a big issue. You are not alone, you have a whole gang.

It's way bigger game with slow pace, so it really depends if you like it or not. You can't know until you try and give it a try. But if you are not patient and expect stuff to happen fast, well it won't.

A bit self promotion, but if you go to my profile, you can read my review where I explained it in way more details.

Good to hear. I already bought it so i was going to play it anyway.
I spent 127 hours in my RDR playthrough, so if RDR 2 is a slower pace, I'll probably hit 300. That's a lot of poker.

Damn, it's about 3 times longer, so yeah probably. There is way more stuff to do.

[MacaroniLL]

Why is there ALWAYS a thread discussing how much "better" RDR2 story is. They are nothing alike there's nothing to compare. 1 is a simple homage to old spaghetti westerns (which needed no sequel or prequel or whatever). 2 is a lame zoomers interpretation of the west. None of you played 1 when it first came out so STFU.

[King Bradley]

Originally posted by MacaroniLL:

Why is there ALWAYS a thread discussing how much "better" RDR2 story is. They are nothing alike there's nothing to compare. 1 is a simple homage to old spaghetti westerns (which needed no sequel or prequel or whatever). 2 is a lame zoomers interpretation of the west. None of you played 1 when it first came out so STFU.

It’s called having opinions. Chill

[Jacket]

Originally posted by MacaroniLL:

Why is there ALWAYS a thread discussing how much "better" RDR2 story is. They are nothing alike there's nothing to compare. 1 is a simple homage to old spaghetti westerns (which needed no sequel or prequel or whatever). 2 is a lame zoomers interpretation of the west. None of you played 1 when it first came out so STFU.

I dont like how the game's story boils down to Micah being the reason why he gang fell apart and to put the blame on him rather than dutch, imo the story would be better if they just didnt have the "rat" plot line.

[KHR3b]

Originally posted by Jacket:

Originally posted by MacaroniLL:

Why is there ALWAYS a thread discussing how much "better" RDR2 story is. They are nothing alike there's nothing to compare. 1 is a simple homage to old spaghetti westerns (which needed no sequel or prequel or whatever). 2 is a lame zoomers interpretation of the west. None of you played 1 when it first came out so STFU.

I dont like how the game's story boils down to Micah being the reason why he gang fell apart and to put the blame on him rather than dutch, imo the story would be better if they just didnt have the "rat" plot line.

Nah, it's typical houser writing so there is always "sudden" (predictable) betrayal from a rat by the end of a game.

[catguy]

Open your mind man, you should just wait until you complete the story and keep in mind its 2010's it will always be a bit absurd :pppp