Why do people complain about the price so much?

[Tanis]

To be completely honest, $50 isn't that bad when you consider it.
Porting a 14 year old game made strictly for console controls to PC would require a ridiculous amount of work; coming from a programmer I'd say it's a fair price, albeit I am just a student and not some highly educated one with several degrees.
Not to mention if you convert it $/T, I personally will get my share out of this game but at the end of the day to each his own.

edit: Lord above stop having ♥♥♥♥ measuring contests with other about either "owning the game" or "being a sheep because you own the game", I'm personally done with this discussion because it is very literally just people trying to prove that their ♥♥♥♥ is bigger than somebody elses.
Those who own the game? I hope you enjoy it.
Those who don't and are waiting for a sale? I hope it comes soon and that you enjoy it.
Those pirating the game? I hope it's a safe pirate and that you enjoy it.
Those who aren't getting the game? I hope you play games you like and enjoy it.

[Purpleetea]

alumlovescake lähetti viestin:

It its not a "fair amount of work"

it is a cheap low quality port

+1

[Cenabet Savaşçı]

Trash kidz The StAnK lähetti viestin:

broke people problems:bleach:

I hope you go broke and live alone too

[Mutharex - Allkeyshop]

Mazak lähetti viestin:

To be completely honest, $50 isn't that bad when you consider it.
Porting a 14 year old game made strictly for console controls to PC would require a ridiculous amount of work; coming from a programmer I'd say it's a fair price, albeit I am just a student and not some highly educated one with several degrees.
Not to mention if you convert it $/T, I personally will get my share out of this game but at the end of the day to each his own.

I see you have the game, so I am gonna ask, is this in some way a 'remake' or has improved graphics or using a modern version of the engine, like RDR2?

[oldagetron]

Its way over priced, should be £10, thats it £15 max.

[Tanis]

Aéroporc lähetti viestin:

That's not users's business. We are talking about a mass product being made 14 years ago. Do you really thing the price would be different if the task was easier ? That's just cash grabbing.

Keyword there, "IF", if's don't count really, if is a could of been and not what is

[Tanis]

Mutharex - Allkeyshop lähetti viestin:

Mazak lähetti viestin:

To be completely honest, $50 isn't that bad when you consider it.
Porting a 14 year old game made strictly for console controls to PC would require a ridiculous amount of work; coming from a programmer I'd say it's a fair price, albeit I am just a student and not some highly educated one with several degrees.
Not to mention if you convert it $/T, I personally will get my share out of this game but at the end of the day to each his own.

I see you have the game, so I am gonna ask, is this in some way a 'remake' or has improved graphics or using a modern version of the engine, like RDR2?

Graphics wise game is pretty good, did they change them?
I can't say I haven't played the game in years before this and don't remember exactly how they were.
But so far the game runs fine and is enjoyable

[Punished Rusty Shackleford]

the poors like to make a stink when they want to spend money on a game but don't want to go a week without buying their meth.

[Who]

just because some PC gamers have a spine and dont like how rockstar usually treat them dont make them brokies everyone is free to make their own choice.

[Mutharex - Allkeyshop]

Mazak lähetti viestin:

Mutharex - Allkeyshop lähetti viestin:

I see you have the game, so I am gonna ask, is this in some way a 'remake' or has improved graphics or using a modern version of the engine, like RDR2?

Graphics wise game is pretty good, did they change them?
I can't say I haven't played the game in years before this and don't remember exactly how they were.
But so far the game runs fine and is enjoyable

Well I suppose the question was more to see if it looks good or like a 360 game, so I consider it answered. Thanks

[Hiei-]

Probably because most of us already bought it on XBOX 360/PS3 at full price when it was first released, then Undead Nightmare DLC. Then some of us (like me) also bought the game of the year version to get all DLCs, but I don't complain at all personally, it's in my wishlist, I would be happy to play the game again, when it'll be at 50% off (I could buy it at full price, and I probably would if I had never played the game before).

[ꉔꏂ꒐꒒ꇙ]

Mazak lähetti viestin:

To be completely honest, $50 isn't that bad when you consider it.

Speaking as someone who doesn't value their money. You can get both RDR games on Xbox for the same price as this version.

https://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/store/red-dead-redemption-red-dead-redemption-2-bundle/9P86HR73LQJZ/0010

This port could have cost $25-$30+tax (since it does come with Undead Nightmare but don't forget the tax, which adds to the final price) If it cost $30+ that's like, $20 for the game and $10 for the Undead Nightmare (which is also on sale on Xbox for $7 something)

[itzinferno1]

50$ is not problem the problem regional pricing. rockstar did not localize their price in many region.

[Grisu]

Because PC gamers aren't all sheeps.

[ꉔꏂ꒐꒒ꇙ]

itzinferno1 lähetti viestin:

50$ is not problem

It sure is. Not for the Whales/Sheep though. They support and buy whatever without a thought.

Grisu lähetti viestin:

Because PC gamers aren't all sheeps. :pet:

Preach!

[WarLyric]

While porting an older console-exclusive game to PC does require work, the $50 price point feels steep for several reasons:

Outdated Graphics and Gameplay This is a 14-year-old game, meaning its graphics, mechanics, and overall design don’t compare to today’s standards. Although nostalgia has value, it’s difficult to justify paying near-modern prices for a game that hasn’t been significantly updated to match current expectations.

Lack of Enhancements or New Content From what’s been shown, this port doesn’t add much in terms of remastered graphics, new content, or quality-of-life improvements that would make it feel like a refreshed experience. Without meaningful upgrades, the game will likely feel dated, and players may question the premium price point.

Price Discrepancy Across Platforms The same game has been sold for $20 on Xbox during sales, which feels much more in line with its age. To charge PC players more than double, with minimal changes, feels inconsistent especially since many would expect cross-platform pricing parity.

Better Value in Newer Titles A newer, feature-rich game like *Red Dead Redemption 2 often retails for less than $50 and offers significantly more in terms of graphics, story depth, and overall polish. Even for fans of this classic, it’s hard to justify paying more for a game that can’t match the content, performance, or technical advancements of more recent releases.

Minimal Effort in Porting This is a straight port with minimal improvements, no multiplayer, and no new gameplay modes or online features. The idea that porting it required a “ridiculous amount of work” doesn’t align with the lack of upgrades offered. Given these conditions, a $50 price seems excessive.

For those who enjoy nostalgia, the game may hold some value, but it’s a tough sell for most players when newer, more polished experiences are available at a similar or even lower price.

With that said, I still may purchase it, simply because I've waited 14 years for a PC release even if I don’t agree with the price. I believe the real question should be whether this game will actually sell at the asking price and how soon it will go on sale.