Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's not even close to anything I was saying. Typical non-sensical jargon from someone who lost a debate and their ego is the size of the Earth that they can't just admit that they were wrong.
Considering the first PS console to run at 4k was PS4 Pro, that's a pretty obvious answer. Therein lies why RDR is an HD Remaster. This port is programmed to be re-rendered and perform at higher resolutions and performance increases than the original 2010 release. On top of that it even has graphical enhancements from RDRII.
If you don't get that, then at this point I think you're just trolling.
Please see above post. This port running at a HIGHER RESOLUTION AND FRAMERATE THAN THE ORIGINAL 2010 PS3 VERSION is what makes it an HD Remaster. You know it doesn't have to say HD Remaster in the title to be an HD Remaster, right? ;)
Generally speaking, yes, I would agree it's a remaster by the old definition of the word. It is, however, not an "HD Remaster" in terms of modern remaster standards, which tend to do more than simply up the resolution and FPS. Take the upcoming "The Thing Remastered", which while it retains the old and dated art style of the original, has updated textures, character models, and particle effects.