Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
lmfao you're bad at this
Seeing "Hey I want to know why this game is considered bad and if it's still worth playing in spite of that" and posting a half-dozen paragraphs that amount to "It's bad and unsuccessful and unpopular" without any elaboration is really not an appropriate response whether you're taking this seriously or just trolling. You showed that you missed the point of the question entirely and not-at-all-subtly declared yourself a nuisance acting in bad faith when you generally want to avoid that, regardless of whether you're trying to convince or ♥♥♥♥ with people. Like ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ I stopped reading your schlock after the first follow-up post, you've wasted far more time on this than I have! Touch grass and go back to the basics! You actually suck at talking to people!
The people whose responses you've accepted provided no further insight into the game, by the way. One stated that Daybreak was the "best game since Zero," which you agreed with to the point of providing an award, another effectively says the dislike was temporary, while providing a take on the game's structure, and the third says Daybreak 2's worth playing because you're already paying the sunk cost. To me, and I'm not involved in your argument with Seagal, you come off as someone who came here looking for some form of validation or confirmation bias, just based on your unhinged reaction to their comments.
You know this isn't a series in which you can skip games. Especially not mid-arc. What you're really asking is if you should drop the series now or not, and you already know your answer to that. I think your main issue with Seagal here is that they're too critical of Falcom for your liking, rather than them not providing the information you're looking for, as again, none of the others have, either.
As some one whos played the jp and korean version op this game has some of the best highes but also some extremely low lows. Over all its enjoyable and but not one of the top in series but its got the same rep sky 3rd did on release where people hated on it and called it filler but after playing kai its far from filler. It was rushed but it improved alot of things that durante used for nisas daybreak 1
In my opinion it's okay, but definitly one of the weaker trial games.
For those who are interested i write bit without major spoiler. But since it's the "Trials Formula" you can guess how the story evolves, thats why i hide it behind spoilers.
A part of the game is build around the "Märchen garden". A virtual world designed by our favorite shadycompany M.T.S.C (Märchen = German for fairytail)
It was hacked and we need to get it back by conquer it.
During the Mainstory you get access to more and more floors.
unfortunatly the märchen garden is what you get when you order the reverie corridor on whish.... In comparsion it's pretty poor designed and boring. Most likely because you didn't have a hub like the garden in TRC which takes away the complete immersion with the party. It's only a menu where you navigate everything like buy/sell/orbments/party etc. and can only active play the floors which you have to conquer.
The game starts about 2 months after the ending of Daybreak 1.
Elaine comes to Van and submits a 4SPG to investigate the case around a serial killer.
The first part is mostly like reverie.
In Act 1 and Act 2 you have 2 (1 A, 1B, 2A, 2B) routes and can choose with which one you start. In every step you have specific characters available.
After the 2 Chapters there is a "intermission" Chapter with the whole gang, which really pushes the mainstory.
After that, starting with Act 3, ♥♥♥♥ is about to get serious.
...to which there's only one response.
No.
http://iruntheinternet.com/lulzdump/images/gifs/reaction-Keanu-Reeves-neo-matrix-no-1379438593x.gif
Cold Steel 1 and Cold Steel 2 (the ones not done by NIS) are peak of the series. Everything else is overpriced, excessively padded fodder. Including Daybreak.
Daybreak wasn't as bad as Reverie, but still.
and you're all going to buy & play it regardless anyways...
Azure was the last good trails game and also the arc where the series peaked.
Even funnier if they charge 60-70 for the standard.
Thats a question i ask myself for example on every battlefield, fifa, NBA Game.
I would never pay even 20 Bucks for them.
Even if i would buy the 150 Bucks version - i already know that i'm gonna play it for around 200 hours (2 times for 100% all ACM, all Floors for the märchen garden etc.). So even that would be a good value in terms of Dollar/Playtime ratio.
CS 3 and 4 for example i played for 600 Hours each - pretty good value i guess
Shizuna is worth $2000 to me xD
Cold Steel 1 is the worst game in the series by far imo, still a decent game though.