Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I also think by default the archer unit should be able to build stuff, no idea why it was excluded :/
Also I wish the norse archer was trainable from the barracks. Only from the hillfort makes it harder to make them and they get them in heroic age, not the classical like other civs.
The same is true of atlanteans who have had extra range added to fire siphons while having that redundant by getting onagers.
IIRC I'm pretty sure the Egyptians work the same way (Slinger *IS* counter-archer, right?)
Which would make the Greeks (and Chinese) the exception(s) instead of the rule.
They're called Ulfsarks and Norse players should be using a lot of them anyway
Same goes for Vermillion,Phoenix,Stymphilian.
Than you have inderect uses like taking care of water myth units which in norse mirror the kraken would easily win over throwing axeman(pick one by one with special until everyone is dead).
I'm pretty happy with the choice of the archer, but putting him in classic age would put the throwing axeman useless. Only difference is that they can't build which I still find it weird...