Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Some character art on the store page looks kinda AI-ish. I had the same thought, its nice to hear that they didnt use it.
One of the replies gave image links.
Like... I'm not going to conclusively say this isn't AI, but for me, it doesn't look all that different from the other '...Of New York' art. Maybe a bit lighter/cleaner. And I choose to take the Devs' word for it that they didn't use AI. (Like, most of the time people who use AI art just admit it since they're either flippant or PROUD. I've yet to see someone lie about using AI art.)
Believe what you believe, but I don't think this is AI.
You know that you can photoshop the parts that look too blatantly like AI yourself?
I think it's better to leave this style in the past. It'll always remind AI art nowadays.
Additionally, the community manager for WoD asked the team, and it was confirmed that all sprites and backgrounds are human made.
Unfortunately, I don't think that makes it AI. People can also just, y'know, draw a thing, make a mistake, and fix THAT with Photoshop, but I feel like we're getting stuck in a loop with that one.
For the latter part, to quote the Dude; That's just, like, your opinion, man. While I prefer the older, more painterly style of this series, I still think this one works. I love the character designs.
And hot take; there's the kicker. 'It's AI' is slowly becoming the new 'Calling my opinion a fact' for many people. Like, just say you don't like the Art. Nobody's gonna judge you for it. People ARE gonna judge you for making, from where I'm standing, baseless accusations that might tarnish the Dev Team's reputation for now reason.
Or on another note: Try to go on Good Faith and trust the Devs when they're saying 'No'. They've got no reason to lie. If anything they got more reason to tell the truth, regarding the Steam Policy of having to disclose using AI art.
....
Sorry for the ramble, and I hope it's not too confrontational, but just as people need to stop hocking AI, the other side needs to stop saying 'AI!' like it's 'WITCH!' when they don't like how something looks. That is NOT the solution.
Anyway, Imma just step back from this conversation. (Or attempt to, I can be a stubborn witch.) and just enjoy the game. If you don't like the artwork, just refund. No need to go shouting (IMHO) baseless accusations about it.
I don't think this was all painted by hand of course, there must have been some level of photobashing involved, perhaps use of 3d assets, perhaps some amount of tracing/touching it up with brush strokes to make it look more painterly - digital art has tons of different ways to work a picture - which is all perfectly fine in my book.
So finally, there were doubtless skilled, hard working artists involved, and accusing them of AI without concrete proof is really disrespectful and disheartening.
probably used ai then fixed the problems by hand
Exactly! Fanboys are so thick to understand that.