LOLLIPOP CHAINSAW RePOP

LOLLIPOP CHAINSAW RePOP

View Stats:
❃ Danuki Vtuber ❃ Sep 12, 2024 @ 9:29am
12
4
4
Is it DEI free ?
Just asking don't want a tone down / censored game
< >
Showing 31-45 of 260 comments
Clone303 Sep 12, 2024 @ 11:36am 
Yes, it's so old, it doesn't know that is
Saii Sep 12, 2024 @ 11:42am 
Originally posted by Massapan:
If anything, i would blame devs for using the UE5 for this, and not sticking to the original engine they used.

As a dev myself, I understand using UE5 and not using the original engine. It would be next to impossible to create a multi platform port with the old engine.

I can't say whether the notion of the physics is difficult in UE5, I would say no, but then again, it is a port after all and it could be that it would have required to re-do the 3d model of Juliet. Tbh, I would not do that too... too much hassle for just some bouncing boobies.
Last edited by Saii; Sep 12, 2024 @ 11:43am
shny_scott Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:04pm 
2
Don't you guys say it's woke when a woman is a random background character? Is this game where you play as a girl somehow "not DEI"?

Nothing will ever satisfy you as long as you continue to scream and whine about this.
Grimdaddy Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:06pm 
Originally posted by shny_scott:
Don't you guys say it's woke when a woman is a random background character?
This is utterly incoherent. No one ever said this :lunar2019laughingpig:
Originally posted by shny_scott:
Don't you guys say it's woke when a woman is a random background character? Is this game where you play as a girl somehow "not DEI"?

Nothing will ever satisfy you as long as you continue to scream and whine about this.

Never said that, you are putting words and accussing others of something we do not do.

DEI is about political activism into video games and studio that downgrade or censor a game for political gains and investors. It could be political correctness, censorship, being against pretty characters, being against comedy, ... You know that very well, you are gaslighting in order to defend your activism.
❃ Danuki Vtuber ❃ Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:12pm 
Originally posted by Grimdaddy:
Originally posted by shny_scott:
Don't you guys say it's woke when a woman is a random background character?
This is utterly incoherent. No one ever said this :lunar2019laughingpig:
Yup. They cry, self-project and gaslight people as their activism get rejected. They are miserable people that only life purpose is activism. Gamers want just fun video games without activism and censorship. But wanting that goes against their ideology hence why they attack people for not wanting DEI in their hobbies
Timur2345 Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:12pm 
Originally posted by Saii:
Originally posted by Massapan:
If anything, i would blame devs for using the UE5 for this, and not sticking to the original engine they used.

As a dev myself, I understand using UE5 and not using the original engine. It would be next to impossible to create a multi platform port with the old engine.

I can't say whether the notion of the physics is difficult in UE5, I would say no, but then again, it is a port after all and it could be that it would have required to re-do the 3d model of Juliet. Tbh, I would not do that too... too much hassle for just some bouncing boobies.
I see, good to know!
Originally posted by mottim:
Originally posted by Saii:

As a dev myself, I understand using UE5 and not using the original engine. It would be next to impossible to create a multi platform port with the old engine.

I can't say whether the notion of the physics is difficult in UE5, I would say no, but then again, it is a port after all and it could be that it would have required to re-do the 3d model of Juliet. Tbh, I would not do that too... too much hassle for just some bouncing boobies.
I see, good to know!


This is not really a engine issue, as the engine is capable of doing this. It was tone down on purpose or just lazy work. It's pretty much camera angles and body physics, either they censored the game on purpose or they were too lazy to recreate it exactly the same
Originally posted by God of War:
Originally posted by Anthony:
Just asking don't want a tone down / censored game

No. It seems like that resources were spent to develop the new repop mode instead of licensing original music and recreating protagonist's original physics. Maybe, "consultants" gave the advice to develop repop mode.

could be that, wasted ressources on purpose
Fezzy Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:30pm 
clown
Clive Rosfield Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:35pm 
Originally posted by Grimdaddy:
Original Mode is supposed to be uncensored. RePop mode is for more sensitive snowflake types, allegedly. I have not been able to play as of yet, so I cannot confirm either right now.
Original mode is nothing but the Valentine's Day edition released exclusively in Japan back in 2013, minus the non-comic intros.

Stop making everything about "wokies"
Ingel Riday Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:43pm 
2
From everything I have read thus far, it's relatively DEI free... but it did squander resources on a pointless censored mode.

Who is RePOP mode for? The fanbase for this franchise will never use it, and the modern audience that the developers tried to court with it won't buy this game unless ALL OF IT IS CENSORED FOR EVERYONE. It isn't enough for the virtue-police to have a version that's more palatable to their Puritan values. No, they need the old fanbase to be forced into using the censored mode, too. They want a bended-knee. They want a "it was wrong then, and it is wrong now. We apologize" treatment of this game and no "Original Mode" whatsoever.

IGN won't even review this title because "Original Mode" exists. Most reviewers aren't touching it, and that means no word of mouth. No presence in traditional media.

Quite frankly, the developers should have foreseen this and not even wasted a drop of sweat or a single penny pandering to them in the first place. Poor priorities. Should have passed on RePOP mode entirely, run an ad campaign emphasizing faithfulness to the original version with improvements to controls and camera, and tried to secure at least a few licensed songs to keep some of the original vibe (Hey Mickey. Of all the songs, Hey Mickey is the worst loss).

Instead, we have this. A product kind of made for no one. I might buy it when it's on sale and has had a massive number of performance patches, but eh.

TLDR: not a lot of DEI. Worst thing you'll hear is that the character physics are downgraded, but with all the bugs on release... maybe Juliet's bosom is glitched?
_________________________
Edit addition: When I say "made for no one," I mean that the Puritans don't want this because it offends their sensibilities and includes the irredeemably offensive (to them) original version. Meanwhile, the fans for Lollipop Chainsaw don't really want this game without any of its original licensed music and are leery of it having hidden censorship issues because of RePOP mode existing in the first place.

Nobody really wins here. Would have been better to just get the original Xbox 360 release backwards-compatible on the Xbox Series X and leave it at that.
Last edited by Ingel Riday; Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:49pm
Sharkle_Bunwich Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:46pm 
How do you people genuinely live like this?
Rowby Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:47pm 
2
I genuinely don't know how you folks survive in the real world. Like do you go to a coffee shop and say "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ DEI" because a girl with blue hair made your drink???
Timur2345 Sep 12, 2024 @ 12:53pm 
Originally posted by Roku:
I genuinely don't know how you folks survive in the real world. Like do you go to a coffee shop and say "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ DEI" because a girl with blue hair made your drink???
What kind of an argument is that? Do you hate blue haired girls that much, so you use it to prove your point? Also what drink are you even talking about, if its a beer, then its because i dont drink alcohol, not because the girl who offered it is blue haired lol.
< >
Showing 31-45 of 260 comments
Per page: 1530 50